Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019:46:126-141.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 May 18.

Effects of Geometric Toy Design on Parent-Child Interactions and Spatial Language

Brian N Verdine  1 , Laura Zimmermann  1 , Lindsey Foster  1 , Maya A Marzouk  2 , Roberta Michnick Golinkoff  1 , Kathy Hirsh-Pasek  2 , Nora Newcombe  3
Affiliations

Effects of Geometric Toy Design on Parent-Child Interactions and Spatial Language

Brian N Verdine et al. Early Child Res Q. 2019.

Abstract

Geometric forms have formal definitions. While knowing shape names is considered important for school-readiness, many children do not understand the defining features of shapes until well into elementary school (Satlow & Newcombe, 1998). One reason is likely that they do not encounter enough variety in the shapes they see (citation removed). The present study observed 60 parents and their 3-year-old children during play with geometric toys, exploring how spatial language varied with the nature of the shape-toy set (canonical shapes versus a mix of canonical and unusual or less-canonical variants) and whether geometric shapes were presented as tangible, traditional toys or shown on a touchscreen tablet app. Although children in the app condition heard more shape names than the other conditions due to the language produced by the app itself, children used more overall words and more spatial language with tangible toys that included varied shapes. In addition, parents used more shape names with sons than with daughters and tended to adjust their use of spatial language more in response to varied shape sets with boys, although these findings need replication to evaluate generality. These data suggest that including non-canonical shapes in tangible shape toys may provide a low-cost, high-impact way of refining adult-child interactions that might facilitate children's early geometric knowledge.

Keywords: digital; geometry; language; preschool; spatial; touchscreen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The toys used for each of the 3 study conditions. Conditions: Std = Standard; Alt = Alternate; Tab (Par Only) = Tablet (Parent production); Tab (Par+Tab) = Tablet (Parent and Tablet production)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plots showing bootstrapped mean tokens with 95% confidence intervals by speaker for the main study variables (all tokens, shape name tokens, spatial language tokens, number tokens, and questions asked).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bootstrapped means and 95% confidence intervals for Parent Production variables with regressions showing significant effects of sex (Shape Name Tokens), significant interactions of sex and condition (Spatial Language Types), or both (E. Continuous Amount Tokens and Types). Lines represent the sex of the child.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baenninger M, Newcombe NS. Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences. 1995;7(4):363–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90007-1 - DOI
    1. Borriello GA, Liben LS. Encouraging maternal guidance of preschoolers’ spatial thinking during block play. Child Development. 2017 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12779 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown R. How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review. 1958;65(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041727 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cannon J, Levine SC, Huttenlocher J. A system for analyzing children and caregivers’ language about space in structured and unstructured contexts. Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center (SILC) technical report; 2007.
    1. Carmichael CA, Hayes BK. Prior knowledge and exemplar encoding in children’s concept acquisition. Child Development. 2001;72(4):1071–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00335 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources