Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;181(4):1193-1209.
doi: 10.1111/rssa.12357. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

Generalizing Evidence from Randomized Trials using Inverse Probability of Sampling Weights

Affiliations

Generalizing Evidence from Randomized Trials using Inverse Probability of Sampling Weights

Ashley L Buchanan et al. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Results obtained in randomized trials may not easily generalize to target populations. Whereas in randomized trials the treatment assignment mechanism is known, the sampling mechanism by which individuals are selected to participate in the trial is typically not known and assuming random sampling from the target population is often dubious. We consider an inverse probability of sampling weighted (IPSW) estimator for generalizing trial results to a target population. The IPSW estimator is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. A consistent sandwich-type variance estimator is derived and simulation results are presented comparing the IPSW estimator to a previously proposed stratified estimator. The methods are then utilized to generalize results from two randomized trials of HIV treatment to all people living with HIV in the United States.

Keywords: Causal inference; External validity/Generalizability; HIV/AIDS; Inverse probability weights; Randomized controlled trial; Target population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of the distributions of within-trial estimator Δ^T, stratified estimator Δ^S, and inverse probability of sampling weighted estimator Δ^IPSW, based on 5,000 simulated data sets where the sampling score model is correctly specified and Δ = 2 with one continuous covariate, β = (7, 0.6) and α = 1 (scenario 4).

References

    1. Allcott H. Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics. 2011;95:1082–1095.
    1. Allcott H. Site selection bias in program evaluation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2015;130:1117–1165.
    1. Allcott H, Mullainathan S. Tech rep. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2012. External validity and partner selection bias. (Working Paper Number 18373).
    1. Bacon MC, von Wyl V, Alden C, Sharp G, Robison E, Hessol N. The Women’s Interagency HIV Study: An observational cohort brings clinical sciences to the bench. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 2005;12:1013–1019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. New York: CRC Press; 2010.

LinkOut - more resources