Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 28:9:2861.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02861. eCollection 2018.

Isolation, Characterization and Performance of Autochthonous Spray Dried Lactic Acid Bacteria in Maize Micro and Bucket-Silos

Affiliations

Isolation, Characterization and Performance of Autochthonous Spray Dried Lactic Acid Bacteria in Maize Micro and Bucket-Silos

Patricia Burns et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to isolate, identify and characterize lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from spontaneously fermented maize silage, and evaluate their performance as spray-dried (SD) cultures to enhance the fermentation and the aerobic stability of maize micro-silos. Eleven strains of LAB were characterized for growth kinetics, the capability to grow in vegetable-based medium (VBM), production of organic acids and the ability to tolerate heat-stress. Three strains (Lactobacillus plantarum Ls71, Pediococcus acidilactici Ls72, and Lactobacillus buchneri Ls141) were selected and further characterized for the ability to grow as single strain or in co-culture in MRS and VMB medium, to survive at freeze and spray-drying process, for their performance as SD bacteria in micro-silos and for the aerobic stability in bucket silos. L. buchneri Ls141 showed the highest growth capability in VBM and produced the highest amount of acetic acid, while L. plantarum Ls71 produced the highest amounts of lactic acid. P. acidilactici Ls72 was the most heat-resistant strain, with a reduction of 0.2 log10 CFU/mL (15 min at 55°C). The three strains satisfactorily tolerated both spray and freeze-drying. After 4 days of fermentation, all the samples reached a pH value of about 3.7-3.8. A significantly lower cell load of filamentous fungi and yeasts (< 3 log10 CFU/g) and a higher concentration of total LAB (> 8.7 log10 CFU/g) was observed after 30 days of fermentation. A greater amount of acetic acid, crude protein, ash and ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen was detected in inoculated silages. A significant reduction of filamentous fungi and yeasts was also observed in inoculated bucket silos after 50 d of fermentation. The aerobic stability was significantly improved in inoculated silage since the temperature remained stable after 16 days (384 h). On the contrary, an increase of 5°C was observed in control samples after 1 day. The selected strains have the potential to be produced as SD silage inoculant as they were able to accelerate the fermentation process, to control filamentous fungi and yeasts, to improve some nutritional and chemical parameters of silage and to improve aerobic stability.

Keywords: aerobic stability; inoculant; lactic acid bacteria; maize; silage; spray-drying.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cell growth in MRS broth (Δ log10 CFU/mL ± SEM) at 30 (formula image), 34 (formula image), 37 (formula image), and 43 (formula image) °C after 24 h, aerobiosis.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cell growth (Δ log10 CFU/mL ± SEM) in VBM after 24 (formula image), 48 (formula image), and 72 h (formula image) at 34°C, aerobiosis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Cell death (Δ log10 CFU/mL ± SEM) after 5 (formula image) and 15(formula image) min at 55°C.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Aerobic stability of silages during time expressed as Δ temperatures (°C): the ambient temperature was subtracted from the temperature measured inside each silo (Tsilo–Tamb). UC (●); SDB-E (formula image). Mean values ± SD are shown.

References

    1. Ávila C. L. S., Carvalho B. F., Pinto J. C., Duarte W. F., Schwan R. F. (2014). The use of Lactobacillus species as starter cultures for enhancing the quality of sugar cane silage. J. Dairy Sci. 97 940–951. 10.3168/jds.2013-6987 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blain J. M., Urtinett M. A. (1954). Dtermination de l’ammoniac dans les ensilages in Conférence Européene des Herbasges. Paris 21–24, 304–314.
    1. Borreani G., Tabacco E., Schmidt R. J., Holmes B. J., Muck R. E. (2018). Silage review: factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J. Dairy Sci. 101 3952–3979. 10.3168/jds.2017-13837 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cai Y., Benno Y., Ogawa M., Ohmomo S., Kumai S., Nakase T. (1998). Influence of Lactobacillus spp. from an inoculant and of Weissella and Leuconostoc spp. from forage crops on silage fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 2982–2987. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunière L., Sindou J., Chaucheyras-Durand F., Chevallier I., Thévenot-Sergentet D. (2013). Silage processing and strategies to prevent persistence of undesirable microorganisms. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 182 1–15. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.006 - DOI