Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 10:76:77.
doi: 10.1186/s13690-018-0320-2. eCollection 2018.

A comparative analysis of socioeconomic inequities in stunting: a case of three middle-income African countries

Affiliations

A comparative analysis of socioeconomic inequities in stunting: a case of three middle-income African countries

Coretta M P Jonah et al. Arch Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Despite increased economic growth and development, and existence of various policies and interventions aimed at improving food security and nutrition, majority of countries in sub-Saharan Africa have very high levels of child malnutrition. The prevalence of stunting, an indicator of chronic malnutrition, is especially high.

Methods: In this paper, we use Demographic and Health Survey datasets from three countries in the region that obtained middle-income status over the last decade (Ghana, Kenya and Zambia), to provide a comparative quantitative assessment of stunting levels, and examine patterns in stunting inequalities between 2007 and 2014.

Results: Our analyses reveal that stunting rates decreased in all three countries over the study period, but are still high. In Zambia, 40% of under 5-year olds are stunted, compared to 26% in Kenya and 19% in Ghana. In all three countries, male children and those living in the poorest households have significantly higher levels of stunting. We also observe stark inequalities across socio-economic status, and show that these inequalities have increased over time.

Conclusions: Our results reveal that even with economic gains at the national level, there is need for continued focus on improving the socio-economic levels of the poorest households, if child nutritional outcomes are to improve.

Keywords: Children; Concentration curves; Concentration indices; Ghana; Inequality; Kenya; Malnutrition; Middle-income; Stunting; Sub-Saharan Africa; Zambia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Our study is based on Demographic and Health Survey data, which is routinely collected. Procedures and questionnaires for standard DHS have been reviewed and approved by ICF Institutional Review Board (IRB). Additionally, country-specific DHS protocols are reviewed by the ICF IRB and IRBs in Ghana, Kenya and Zambia.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kernel density estimations for Ghana, Zambia and Kenya, using HAZ, WAZ and WHZ. Source: DHS (2007,2008, 2013 and 2014). Authors’ calculations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Levels of malnutrition in Ghana, Kenya and Zambia. Source: DHS (2007,2008, 2013 and 2014). Authors’ calculations
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Stunting Concentrations curve for Ghana 2008 and 2014. Source: Ghana DHS 2008 and 2014. Authors’ calculations
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Stunting Concentration curve for Zambia 2007 and 2013. Source: Zambian DHS 2007 and 2013. Authors’ calculations
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Stunting concentration curve for Kenya, 2008 and 2014. Source: Kenyan DHS 2008 and 2014. Authors’ calculations
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Urban and rural concentration curves for stunting in Ghana. Source: DHS (2008 and 2014). Authors’ calculations
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Urban and rural concentration curves for stunting in Zambia. Source: DHS (2007 and 2013) DHS. Authors’ calculations
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Urban and rural concentration curves for stunting in Kenya. Source: DHS (2008 and 2014). Authors’ calculations
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Stunting rates, by GNI ($PPP) per capita. Source: United Nations Development Programme - Human Development Report 2016

References

    1. Fantom N, Serajuddin U. The World Bank’s Classification of Countries by Income [Internet]. 2016. (Policy Research Working Paper). Report No.: 7528. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/23628/The0Wor.... Accessed 8 May 2018.
    1. Ranis G, Stewart F, Ramirez A. Economic growth and human development. World Dev. 2000;28(2):197–219. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00131-X. - DOI
    1. Bloom DE, Canning D, Sevilla J. The effect of health on economic growth: a production function approach. World Dev. 2004;32(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.002. - DOI
    1. Kanbur R, Sumner A. Poor countries or poor people? Development assistance and the new geography of global poverty. J Int Dev. 2012;24:686–695. doi: 10.1002/jid.2861. - DOI
    1. Ettner SL. New evidence on the relationship between income and health. J Health Econ. 1996;15(1996):67–85. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00032-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources