Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 14;4(12):eaau1255.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau1255. eCollection 2018 Dec.

All-photonic quantum teleportation using on-demand solid-state quantum emitters

Affiliations

All-photonic quantum teleportation using on-demand solid-state quantum emitters

Marcus Reindl et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

All-optical quantum teleportation lies at the heart of quantum communication science and technology. This quantum phenomenon is built up around the nonlocal properties of entangled states of light that, in the perspective of real-life applications, should be encoded on photon pairs generated on demand. Despite recent advances, however, the exploitation of deterministic quantum light sources in push-button quantum teleportation schemes remains a major open challenge. Here, we perform an important step toward this goal and show that photon pairs generated on demand by a GaAs quantum dot can be used to implement a teleportation protocol whose fidelity violates the classical limit (by more than 5 SDs) for arbitrary input states. Moreover, we develop a theoretical framework that matches the experimental observations and that defines the degree of entanglement and indistinguishability needed to overcome the classical limit independently of the input state. Our results emphasize that on-demand solid-state quantum emitters are one of the most promising candidates to realize deterministic quantum teleportation in practical quantum networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. On-demand photon source and quantum teleportation setup.
(A) The radiative recombination of XX-X states provides two photons entangled in polarization if the energetic splitting of the X state, the fine structure splitting (FSS), is sufficiently low. The on-demand generation occurs via a resonant laser tuned to half the energy of the XX state. EB indicates the XX binding energy. (B) Population of the XX state as a function of the pulse area. The experimental data (circles) are modeled as an exponentially damped sine-squared function (purple curve) to determine the depicted preparation fidelity. (C) The autocorrelation measurements for the XX and X transition of a representative QD. (D) The experimental setup for quantum teleportation. A pulsed laser [titanium sapphire (TiSa)] is used to excite two times the QD, which then emits an early pair (PE) and a late pair (PL) of entangled photons separated by Δt in time. The XX and X photons are then spectrally separated by a filter (F). The early XE and late XL pass a HOM Mach-Zehnder consisting of two beam splitters (BSs), performing the Bell state measurement. Polarizers (POLs) and variable retarders (VRs) are used to define the XL input state and XXE detection state accordingly. The three-photon correlation measurement is then recorded as a function of arrival times τ with avalanche photodiodes (APDs).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Indistinguishability and degree of entanglement of QD1.
(A) The two-photon interference measurement using copolarized settings. The histograms envelope function (bold red) is the sum of five Lorentzian peaks fitted to the HOM quintuplet. The resulting raw two-photon interference visibility is VX = 65(2) %. (B) XX-X cross-correlation measurements for different polarization detection bases: rectilinear (V, H), diagonal (D, A), and circular basis (R, L).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Measurement of the teleportation fidelity using QD1.
(A) Normalized third-order correlation of a D-polarized X input state for copolarized (left) and cross-polarized (right) detection of the XX photons. (B) Integrated coincidences for both detection bases for different excitation cycles (top) and the corresponding calculated teleportation fidelity (bottom). (C) Teleportation fidelities for a full set of orthogonal input states. The classical limit is highlighted as a dashed orange line.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Single-qubit tomography and theoretical modeling of experimental data.
(A) Real and imaginary parts of the measured density matrix of the quantum teleportation using QD2. The reference frame is chosen with respect to the diagonal input state. (B) Calculated average teleportation fidelity based on our model. The change in teleportation fidelity is shown for vanishing FSS (perfect entanglement fidelity) and varying visibility and for perfect visibility and varying FSS. The teleportation fidelity as a function of the entanglement fidelity is additionally calculated from the two-photon state’s evolution using the average X lifetime of T1X=265(10) ps. Each of the panels contains the expected ideal behavior (dashed line) compared with the real experimental conditions (solid line), considering polarization-dependent, relative phase shifts introduced by the optical setup. (C) The average teleportation fidelity of all measured QDs (green dot) and their predicted theoretical value (blue circle).

References

    1. Kimble H. J., The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008). - PubMed
    1. Lo H.-K., Chau H. F., Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over arbitrarily long distances. Science 283, 2050–2056 (1999). - PubMed
    1. Bennett C. H., Brassard G., Crépeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., Wootters W. K., Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993). - PubMed
    1. Bouwmeester D., Pan J.-W., Mattle K., Eibl M., Weinfurter H., Zeilinger A., Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390, 575–579 (1997).
    1. Boschi D., Branca S., De Martini F., Hardy L., Popescu S., Experimental realization of teleporting an unknown pure quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121–1125 (1998).

LinkOut - more resources