Surgery and protontherapy in Grade I and II skull base chondrosarcoma: A comparative retrospective study

Abstract

Objective: Skull base chondrosarcoma is a rare tumour usually treated by surgery and proton therapy. However, as mortality rate is very low and treatment complications are frequent, a less aggressive therapeutic strategy could be considered. The objective of this study was to compare the results of surgery only vs surgery and adjuvant proton therapy, in terms of survival and treatment adverse effects, based on a retrospective series.

Methods: Monocentric retrospective study at a tertiary care centre. All patients treated for a skull base grade I and II chondrosarcoma were included. We collected data concerning surgical and proton therapy treatment and up-to-date follow-up, including Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scores.

Results: 47 patients (23M/24F) were operated on between 2002 and 2015; mean age at diagnosis was 47 years-old (10-85). Petroclival and anterior skull base locations were found in 34 and 13 patients, respectively. Gross total resection was achieved in 17 cases (36%) and partial in 30 (64%). Adjuvant proton therapy (mean total dose 70 GyRBE,1.8 GyRBE/day) was administered in 23 cases. Overall mean follow-up was 91 months (7-182). Of the patients treated by surgery only, 8 (34%) experienced residual tumour progression (mean delay 51 months) and 5 received second-line proton therapy. Adjuvant proton therapy was associated with a significantly lower rate of relapse (11%; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in 10-year disease specific survival between patients initially treated with or without adjuvant proton therapy (100% vs 89.8%, p = 0.14). Difference in high-grade toxicity was not statistically significant between patients in both groups (25% (7) vs 11% (5), p = 0.10). The most frequent adverse effect of proton therapy was sensorineural hearing loss (39%).

Conclusion: Long-term disease specific survival was not significantly lower in patients without adjuvant proton therapy, but they experienced less adverse effects. We believe a surgery only strategy could be discussed, delaying as much as possible proton therapy in cases of relapse. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this more conservative strategy in skull base chondrosarcoma.

Fig 1. Overall and progress-free survival curve.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared using log-rank test. A: Disease specific survival and Progress-free survival in the whole study population. B: PFS comparison of petroclival and anterior skull base anatomical locations shows no significant difference.

Fig 2. Survival curves comparing surgery only vs surgery and protontherapy.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves compared using log-rank test: comparison of surgery and adjuvant proton therapy versus surgery only in the initial treatment. A: Disease specific survival showed no significant difference. B: Progress-free survival showed a significantly better outlook when surgery was associated with adjuvant proton therapy.