Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):1052.
doi: 10.3390/nano8121052.

Enhanced Radiation Tolerance of Tungsten Nanoparticles to He Ion Irradiation

Affiliations

Enhanced Radiation Tolerance of Tungsten Nanoparticles to He Ion Irradiation

E Aradi et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Materials exposed to plasmas in magnetic confinement nuclear reactors will accumulate radiation-induced defects and energetically implanted gas atoms (from the plasma and transmutations), of which insoluble helium (He) is likely to be the most problematic. The large surface-area-to-volume ratio exhibited by nanoporous materials provides an unsaturable sink with the potential to continuously remove both point defects and He. This property enhances the possibilities for these materials to be tailored for high radiation-damage resistance. In order to explore the potential effect of this on the individual ligaments of nanoporous materials, we present results on the response of tungsten (W) nanoparticles (NPs) to 15 keV He ion irradiation. Tungsten foils and various sizes of NPs were ion irradiated concurrently and imaged in-situ via transmission electron microscopy at 750 °C. Helium bubbles were not observed in NPs with diameters less than 20 nm but did form in larger NPs and the foils. No dislocation loops or black spot damage were observed in any NPs up to 100 nm in diameter but were found to accumulate in the W foils. These results indicate that a nanoporous material, particularly one made up of ligaments with characteristic dimensions of 30 nm or less, is likely to exhibit significant resistance to He accumulation and structural damage and, therefore, be highly tolerant to radiation.

Keywords: helium bubbles; in-situ TEM; nanoporous materials; plasma-facing materials; radiation tolerance; tungsten nanoparticles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results”.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SRIM calculations modified using the SICMod code for a circular cross-section of spherical W NPs irradiated with 15 keV He to 1.1 × 1017 ions·cm−2 showing the damage density for diameters of (a) 20 nm and (b) 80 nm. (The colour scale units of damage density apply to both images.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bright-field TEM images showing the distribution of bubbles in W NPs of different sizes after irradiation with 15 keV He to a fluence of 9.6 × 1016 ions·cm−2 at 750 °C showing: (a) a distribution of NPs of different sizes dispersed at the edge of the electropolished region of a W foil before irradiation; (b) 800 nm overfocus; and (c) 800 nm underfocus after irradiation. Small bubbles appear as black spots in overfocus and white spots in underfocus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
BF-TEM images comparing bubbles in a 35 nm diameter W NP (ac) and foil (df) as a function of fluence taken at 400 nm overfocus. The arrows in (ac) highlight the growth of a bubble in the NP as the fluence increases. (Scale marker in (a,d) applies to all images). Figure (g) shows the relationship between bubble density and fluence for NPs with diameters of 20 ± 5 and 50 ± 5 nm in the foil.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Underfocus BF-TEM images for W NPs: (a) unirradiated and (b) irradiated to a fluence of 1.1 × 1017 ions·cm−2 showing the bubble distributions in NPs of different sizes. The relationship between bubble density and particle size for W NPs with different diameters irradiated to a fluence of 1.1 × 1017 ions·cm−2 is shown in (c). (The scale marker in (a) applies to both images.)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Distribution of bubble sizes in W irradiated with 15 keV He to a fluence of 1.1 × 1017 ions·cm−2: (a) 20–35 nm NPs (sample = 80 bubbles in 20 NPs); (b) 40–55 nm (sample = 200 bubbles in 20 NPs); (c) 60–80 nm (sample = 280 bubbles in 28 NPs); and (d) the foils (sample = 280 bubbles). (e) Plot of the size dependence of swelling due to bubbles for W NPs of different diameters.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Plots of: (a) calculations and experimental data [49,50] for density as a function of pressure for He at 625 °C and 750 °C; and (b) relationship between He concentration (based on resolvable bubbles) and NP volume at a fluence of 1.1 × 1017 ions·cm−2.
Figure 7
Figure 7
TEM images of: (a) NPs of different sizes and W foil irradiated to 1.1 × 1017 ions·cm−2; (b) enlarged area of the foil after tilting >15° to be close to a different zone axis to that shown in (a) to avoid any possible g.b invisibility criteria; and (c) enlarged area of NP after equivalent tilting of >15°. Note the complete absence of dislocation loops in the NPs evident in (a,c).

References

    1. Ongena J., Koch R., Wolf R., Zohm H. Magnetic-confinement fusion. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:398–410. doi: 10.1038/nphys3745. - DOI
    1. Shimada M., Campbell D.J., Mukhovatov V., Fujiwara M., Kirneva N., Lackner K., Nagami M., Pustovitov V.D., Uckan N., Wesley J., et al. Progress in the ITER physics basis chapter 1: Overview and summary. Nucl. Fusion. 2007;47 doi: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S01. - DOI
    1. Tokunaga K., Baldwin M.J., Doerner R.P., Noda N., Kubota Y., Yoshida N., Sogabe T., Kato T., Schedler B. Blister formation and deuterium retention on tungsten exposed to low energy and high flux deuterium plasma. J. Nucl. Mater. 2005;337–339:887–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.137. - DOI
    1. Hasegawa A., Fukuda M., Yabuuchi K., Nogami S. Neutron irradiation effects on the microstructural development of tungsten and tungsten alloys. J. Nucl. Mater. 2016;471:175–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.10.047. - DOI
    1. Ueda Y., Coenen J.W., De Temmerman G., Doerner R.P., Linke J., Philipps V., Tsitrone E. Research status and issues of tungsten plasma facing materials for ITER and beyond. Fusion Eng. Des. 2014;89:901–906. doi: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2014.02.078. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources