Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 May;29(5):2716-2723.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5917-x. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

Impact of subcutaneous tunnels on peripherally inserted catheter placement: a multicenter retrospective study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Impact of subcutaneous tunnels on peripherally inserted catheter placement: a multicenter retrospective study

Il Jung Kim et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of subcutaneous tunneling on peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in terms of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs).

Methods: Our dual-facility central institutional review board approved this retrospective study. We compared 302 of 327 consecutive recipients (mean age [± SD], 68.0 ± 15.9 years; men, 134; women, 168) of tunneled PICCs (October 2017 to May 2018) with 309 of 328 consecutive recipients (mean age, 68.7 ± 14.6 years; men, 142; women, 167) of conventional PICCs (April 2016 to September 2017). Tunnels were made near puncture sites (~ 1 in. away) using hemostats or puncture needles. In each group, procedure times and rates of complications, including CLABSI, entry-site infection, dislocation, thrombophlebitis, and occlusion, were examined. Risk factors for CLABSI were analyzed via logistic and Cox regression models.

Results: Subcutaneous tunnels were achieved in all patients, enabling successful peripheral vein cannulations. Group procedure times were similar (p = 0.414). CLABSI proved to be significantly less frequent after tunneling (8/6972 catheter-days) than after conventional (28/7574 catheter-days) PICC placement (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.328; 95% confidence interval, 0.149-0.721). Other risk factors (i.e., age, gender, comorbidity, PICC duration, veins, hospital stay, and intensive care unit stay) showed no significant correlations with CLABSI.

Conclusions: Compared with conventional means, a subcutaneous tunneling approach for PICC placement significantly reduces the rate of CLABSI.

Key points: • Subcutaneous tunnels created to place peripherally inserted central catheters significantly reduced catheter-associated bloodstream infections. • Subcutaneous tunnel creation did not significantly prolong procedural time. • There were no subcutaneous tunnel-related complications.

Keywords: Catheter-related infections; Catheterizations; Central venous catheter; PICC placement; Peripheral.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):489-95 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):1108-1115 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Aug 1;20(15):3276-81 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 2014 Apr;127(4):319-28 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1999 May 4;130(9):729-35 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources