Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 May;29(5):2679-2689.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5902-4. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: contemporary treatment trends and outcomes from the United States National Cancer Database

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: contemporary treatment trends and outcomes from the United States National Cancer Database

Johannes Uhlig et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare utilization and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: The 2004-2015 United States National Cancer Database was queried for HCC patients treated by RFA and surgical resection. Patients were 1:1 propensity score matched. Duration of hospital stay, unplanned readmission rates, and overall survival (OS) were compared in the matched cohort via multivariable regression models.

Results: Eighteen thousand two hundred ninety-six patients were included (RFA, n = 8211; surgical resection, n = 10,085). RFA was more likely in young male whites with high degree of hepatic fibrosis, high bilirubin levels, high INR, and multifocal HCC; resection was more likely in those with private insurance, high income, high cancer grade and stage, and larger HCC. RFA rates varied between 32.3% (East South Central) and 58.5% (New England). Post-treatment outcomes were superior for RFA versus resection regarding duration of hospital stay (median 1 vs. 5d, p < 0.001), 30-day unplanned hospital readmission rates (3.1% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001), and 30-/90-day mortality (0% vs. 4.6%/8%, p < 0.001). Overall survival was comparable for RFA and resection for severe hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis (5-year OS 37.3% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.07), for patients > 65 years old (5-year OS 21.9% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.47), and for HCC < 15 mm (5-year OS 49.7% vs. 52.3%, p = 0.78). OS in the full cohort was superior for surgical resection (5-year OS 29.9% vs. 45.7%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: RFA for HCC shows substantial variation by geography, socioeconomic factors, liver function, and tumor extent. RFA offers superior post-treatment outcomes versus surgical resection and may be an alternative for older patients with cirrhosis and/or small HCC.

Key points: • Duration of hospital stay, unplanned readmissions, and 30-/90-day mortality are lower for RFA versus surgical resection. • RFA and surgical resection show similar survival in severe hepatic fibrosis. • In HCC < 15 mm, RFA and surgical resection yield similar survival.

Keywords: Ablation technique; operative surgical procedures; Demographic factors; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Hepatology. 2013 Jan;57(1):112-9 - PubMed
    1. J Hepatol. 2012 Oct;57(4):794-802 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 2016 Mar;103(4):348-56 - PubMed
    1. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 2017 Dec;72(12):1066-1075 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources