Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.

Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Konstantinos Katsanos et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Several randomized controlled trials ( RCT s) have already shown that paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents significantly reduce the rates of vessel restenosis and target lesion revascularization after lower extremity interventions. Methods and Results A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT s investigating paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoral and/or popliteal arteries was performed. The primary safety measure was all-cause patient death. Risk ratios and risk differences were pooled with a random effects model. In all, 28 RCT s with 4663 patients (89% intermittent claudication) were analyzed. All-cause patient death at 1 year (28 RCT s with 4432 cases) was similar between paclitaxel-coated devices and control arms (2.3% versus 2.3% crude risk of death; risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72-1.61). All-cause death at 2 years (12 RCT s with 2316 cases) was significantly increased in the case of paclitaxel versus control (7.2% versus 3.8% crude risk of death; risk ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.47; -number-needed-to-harm, 29 patients [95% CI , 19-59]). All-cause death up to 5 years (3 RCT s with 863 cases) increased further in the case of paclitaxel (14.7% versus 8.1% crude risk of death; risk ratio, 1.93; 95% CI , 1.27-2.93; -number-needed-to-harm, 14 patients [95% CI , 9-32]). Meta-regression showed a significant relationship between exposure to paclitaxel (dose-time product) and absolute risk of death (0.4±0.1% excess risk of death per paclitaxel mg-year; P<0.001). Trial sequential analysis excluded false-positive findings with 99% certainty (2-sided α, 1.0%). Conclusions There is increased risk of death following application of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in the femoropopliteal artery of the lower limbs. Further investigations are urgently warranted. Clinical Trial Registration URL : www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO . Unique identifier: CRD 42018099447.

Keywords: balloon angioplasty; paclitaxel; paclitaxel‐coated balloon; paclitaxel‐eluting stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Random effects forest plot of all‐cause patient death at 1 year. Pooled point estimate was expressed as risk ratio (RR).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Random effects forest plot of all‐cause death at 2 years. Pooled point estimate was expressed as risk ratio (RR).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Random effects forest plot of all‐cause death at 4 to 5 years. Pooled point estimate was expressed as risk ratio (RR).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Trial sequential analysis of all‐cause death. External red lines denote the O'Brien‐Fleming alpha spending trial sequential monitoring boundaries. Internal red wedge lines denote the futility O'Brien‐Fleming beta spending lines. Cumulative Z curve (blue line) crossed the alpha monitoring boundaries and the required information size (patient sample) has been reached in both illustrative scenarios; (A) α=5%, β=10%; and (B) α=1%, β=10%). Vertical red line denotes the calculated required sample size, whereas the Z value is the test statistic (|Z|=1.96 corresponds to a P value of 0.05; the higher the Z value, the lower the P value).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Meta‐regression (mixed effects model) of all‐cause death against paclitaxel exposure (dose‐time product calculated in milligram‐years). The size of the blue symbols is inversely proportional to the variance of the estimated treatment effect for each study. Solid and dotted red lines indicate the regression line with its corresponding 95% confidence bands. Intercept is −0.8±0.9% and coefficient of the regression line is 0.4±0.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.6%; P<0.001). The equation of the regression line is Y=(−0.008)+0.004X. The “metareg function of the “meta” library was employed in R language.

Comment in

References

    1. Gerhard‐Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, Fleisher LA, Fowkes FG, Hamburg NM, Kinlay S, Lookstein R, Misra S, Mureebe L, Olin JW, Patel RA, Regensteiner JG, Schanzer A, Shishehbor MH, Stewart KJ, Treat‐Jacobson D, Walsh ME. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135:e686–e725. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olin JW, Allie DE, Belkin M, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr, Creager MA, Gerber TC, Hirsch AT, Jaff MR, Kaufman JA, Lewis CA, Martin ET, Martin LG, Sheehan P, Stewart KJ, Treat‐Jacobson D, White CJ, Zheng ZJ, Masoudi FA, Bonow RO, DeLong E, Erwin JP III, Goff DC Jr, Grady K, Green LA, Heidenreich PA, Jenkins KJ, Loth AR, Peterson ED, Shahian DM; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association; American College of Radiology; Society for Cardiac Angiography Interventions; Society for Interventional Radiology; Society for Vascular Medicine; Society for Vascular Nursing; Society for Vascular Surgery . ACCF/AHA/ACR/SCAI/SIR/SVM/SVN/SVS 2010 performance measures for adults with peripheral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures, the American College of Radiology, the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, the Society for Interventional Radiology, the Society for Vascular Medicine, the Society for Vascular Nursing, and the Society for Vascular Surgery (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Peripheral Artery Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:2147–2181. - PubMed
    1. Katsanos K, Tepe G, Tsetis D, Fanelli F. Standards of practice for superficial femoral and popliteal artery angioplasty and stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:592–603. - PubMed
    1. Katsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, Karunanithy N, Krokidis M, Sabharwal T, Taylor P. Bayesian network meta‐analysis of nitinol stents, covered stents, drug‐eluting stents, and drug‐coated balloons in the femoropopliteal artery. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1123–1133.e8. - PubMed
    1. Ng VG, Mena C, Pietras C, Lansky AJ. Local delivery of paclitaxel in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015;45:333–345. - PubMed

MeSH terms