Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2429-2437.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18307.

Association of Maternal First-Trimester Ondansetron Use With Cardiac Malformations and Oral Clefts in Offspring

Affiliations

Association of Maternal First-Trimester Ondansetron Use With Cardiac Malformations and Oral Clefts in Offspring

Krista F Huybrechts et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Evidence for the fetal safety of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that is commonly prescribed for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, is limited and conflicting.

Objective: To evaluate the association between ondansetron exposure during pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective cohort study nested in the 2000-2013 nationwide Medicaid Analytic eXtract. The cohort consisted of 1 816 414 pregnancies contributed by 1 502 895 women enrolled in Medicaid from 3 months before the last menstrual period through 1 month or longer after delivery; infants were enrolled in Medicaid for at least 3 months after birth. The final date of follow-up was December 31, 2013. Analyses were conducted between November 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018. Propensity score stratification was used to control for treatment indication and other confounders.

Exposures: Ondansetron dispensing during the first trimester, the period of organogenesis.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcomes were cardiac malformations and oral clefts diagnosed during the first 90 days after delivery. Secondary outcomes included congenital malformations overall and subgroups of cardiac malformations and oral clefts.

Results: Among 1 816 414 pregnancies (mean age of mothers, 24.3 [5.8] years), 88 467 (4.9%) were exposed to ondansetron during the first trimester. Overall, 14 577 of 1 727 947 unexposed and 835 of 88 467 exposed infants were diagnosed with a cardiac malformation, for an absolute risk of 84.4 (95% CI, 83.0 to 85.7) and 94.4 (95% CI, 88.0 to 100.8) per 10 000 births respectively. The absolute risk of oral clefts was 11.1 per 10 000 births (95% CI, 10.6 to 11.6; 1921 unexposed infants) and was 14.0 per 10 000 births (95% CI, 11.6 to 16.5; 124 exposed infants). The risk of any congenital malformation was 313.5 per 10 000 births (95% CI, 310.9 to 316.1; 54 174 unexposed infants) and was 370.4 (95% CI, 358.0 to 382.9; 3277 exposed infants). The adjusted relative risk (RR) for cardiac malformations was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.06) and the adjusted risk difference (RD) was -0.8 (95% CI, -7.3 to 5.7 per 10 000 births). For oral clefts, the adjusted RR was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.48) and the RD was 2.7 (95% CI, 0.2 to 5.2 per 10 000 births). The adjusted estimate for congenital malformations overall was an RR of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.05) and an RD of 5.4 (95% CI, -7.3 to 18.2 per 10 000 births).

Conclusions and relevance: Among offspring of mothers enrolled in Medicaid, first-trimester exposure to ondansetron was not associated with cardiac malformations or congenital malformations overall after accounting for measured confounders but was associated with a small increased risk of oral clefts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures:

LS, YZ, and HM report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Risk of congenital malformations in infants following exposure to ondansetron during the first trimester: Main analyses
Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals are presented to show the risk of cardiac malformations, oral clefts, and any congenital malformation among infants born to women with exposure to ondansetron during the first trimester, as compared with the risk among infants born to women without such exposure. Propensity score stratified level 1 refers to analyses adjusted for treatment indications and associated factors. Propensity score stratified level 2 refers to analyses adjusted for all potential confounding variables as listed in Table S3. High-dimensional propensity score stratified refers to analyses adjusted for 200 empirically identified covariates, in addition to the pre-specified covariates.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of congenital malformations in infants following exposure to ondansetron during the first trimester: Sensitivity analyses
Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals are presented to show the risk of cardiac malformations, oral clefts, and any congenital malformation among infants born to women with exposure to ondansetron during the first trimester. Results are presented for different sensitivity analyses: (i) changing the reference group to women exposed to any of the three alternative anti-emetics during the first trimester, (ii) changing the reference group to women exposed to metoclopramide during the first trimester, (iii) changing the reference group to women exposed to promethazine during the first trimester, (iv) changing the exposure group to women exposed to pyridoxine during the first trimester, (v) requiring ondansetron-exposed women to have filled at least two prescriptions during the first trimester, (vi) changing the exposure window to 6 to 12 weeks after the date of last menstrual period, (vii) using pregnancies with first exposure to ondansetron 5–8 months after the date of last menstrual period as the reference group, (viii) changing the exposure window to 5–8 months after the date of last menstrual period, which is after the etiologically-relevant window (negative control analysis). Panel A shows the unadjusted associations. Panel B shows the associations adjusted for all potential confounding variables (Propensity Score Level 2). For analyses (iv) and (vii), adjustment was done through 1:1 matching rather than fine stratification on the propensity score due to the relatively small size of the reference group compared to the exposed group.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of congenital malformations in infants following exposure to ondansetron during the first trimester: Sensitivity analyses
Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals are presented to show the risk of cardiac malformations, oral clefts, and any congenital malformation among infants born to women with exposure to ondansetron during the first trimester. Results are presented for different sensitivity analyses: (i) changing the reference group to women exposed to any of the three alternative anti-emetics during the first trimester, (ii) changing the reference group to women exposed to metoclopramide during the first trimester, (iii) changing the reference group to women exposed to promethazine during the first trimester, (iv) changing the exposure group to women exposed to pyridoxine during the first trimester, (v) requiring ondansetron-exposed women to have filled at least two prescriptions during the first trimester, (vi) changing the exposure window to 6 to 12 weeks after the date of last menstrual period, (vii) using pregnancies with first exposure to ondansetron 5–8 months after the date of last menstrual period as the reference group, (viii) changing the exposure window to 5–8 months after the date of last menstrual period, which is after the etiologically-relevant window (negative control analysis). Panel A shows the unadjusted associations. Panel B shows the associations adjusted for all potential confounding variables (Propensity Score Level 2). For analyses (iv) and (vii), adjustment was done through 1:1 matching rather than fine stratification on the propensity score due to the relatively small size of the reference group compared to the exposed group.

Comment in

References

    1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 189: Nausea And Vomiting Of Pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018;131(1):e15–e30. - PubMed
    1. Siminerio LL, Bodnar LM, Venkataramanan R, Caritis SN. Ondansetron Use in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology May 2016;127(5):873–877. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abas MN, Tan PC, Azmi N, Omar SZ. Ondansetron compared with metoclopramide for hyperemesis gravidarum: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and gynecology June 2014;123(6):1272–1279. - PubMed
    1. Kashifard M, Basirat Z, Kashifard M, Golsorkhtabar-Amiri M, Moghaddamnia A. Ondansetrone or metoclopromide? Which is more effective in severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy? A randomized trial double-blind study. Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 2013;40(1):127–130. - PubMed
    1. Oliveira LG, Capp SM, You WB, Riffenburgh RH, Carstairs SD. Ondansetron compared with doxylamine and pyridoxine for treatment of nausea in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and gynecology October 2014;124(4):735–742. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms