Efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 30561620
- DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy813
Efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Aims: The role of aspirin in the primary prevention setting is continuously evolving. Recent randomized trials have challenged the role of aspirin in the primary prevention setting.
Methods and results: Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared aspirin vs. placebo (or control) in subjects without established atherosclerotic disease. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality, while the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Summary estimates were reported using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. A total of 11 trials with 157 248 subjects were included. At a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, aspirin was not associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.02; P = 0.30]; however, aspirin was associated with an increased incidence of major bleeding (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.31-1.65; P < 0.0001) and intracranial haemorrhage (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.58; P = 0.001). A similar effect on all-cause mortality and major bleeding was demonstrated in diabetic and high cardiovascular risk patients (i.e. 10-year risk >7.5%). Aspirin was associated with a lower incidence of myocardial infarction (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94; P = 0.006); however, this outcome was characterized by considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 67%), and this effect was no longer evident upon limiting the analysis to the more recent trials. Trial sequential analysis confirmed the lack of benefit of aspirin for all-cause mortality up to a relative risk reduction of 5%.
Conclusion: Among adults without established cardiovascular disease, aspirin was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality; however, it was associated with an increased incidence of major bleeding. The routine use of aspirin for primary prevention needs to be reconsidered.
Keywords: Aspirin; Cardiovascular; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Prevention.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology 2018.
Comment in
-
The remarkable story of a wonder drug, which now comes to an end in the primary prevention setting: say bye-bye to aspirin!Eur Heart J. 2019 Feb 14;40(7):618-620. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy872. Eur Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30590516 No abstract available.
-
Response to Commentary for 'Efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials'.Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 7;40(34):2924-2925. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz224. Eur Heart J. 2019. PMID: 31005974 No abstract available.
-
Aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention: is there a need for risk stratification?Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 7;40(34):2922-2923. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz223. Eur Heart J. 2019. PMID: 31005987 No abstract available.
-
The influence of the baseline 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk on cardiovascular outcomes with aspirin for primary prevention: a meta-regression analysis.Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Apr 1;6(2):175-176. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz049. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 31553436 No abstract available.
-
PURL:Rethinking daily aspirin for primary prevention.J Fam Pract. 2020 Nov;69(9):461-462. doi: 10.12788/jfp.0092. J Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 33176342 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
