Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 1;111(2):118-128.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy196.

Seamless Designs: Current Practice and Considerations for Early-Phase Drug Development in Oncology

Affiliations
Review

Seamless Designs: Current Practice and Considerations for Early-Phase Drug Development in Oncology

Brian P Hobbs et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Traditionally, drug development has evaluated dose, safety, activity, and comparative benefit in a sequence of phases using trial designs and endpoints specifically devised for each phase. Innovations in drug development seek to consolidate the phases and rapidly expand accrual with "seamless" trial designs. Although consolidation and rapid accrual may yield efficiencies, widespread use of seamless first-in-human (FiH) trials without careful consideration of objectives, statistical analysis plans, or trial oversight raises concerns. A working group formed by the National Cancer Institute convened to consider and discuss opportunities and challenges for such trials as well as encourage responsible use of these designs. We reviewed all abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings from 2010 to 2017 for FiH trials enrolling at least 100 patients. We identified 1786 early-phase trials enrolling 57 559 adult patients. Fifty-one of the trials (2.9%) investigated 50 investigational new drugs, were seamless, and accounted for 14.6% of the total patients. The seamless trials included a median of 3 (range = 1-13) expansion cohorts. The overall risk of clinically significant treatment-related adverse events (grade 3-4) was 49.1% (range = 0.0-100%), and seven studies reported at least one toxic death. Rapid expansion of FiH trials may lead to earlier drug approval and corresponding widespread patient access to active therapeutics. Nevertheless, seamless designs must adhere to established ethical, scientific, and statistical standards. Protocols should include prospectively planned analyses of efficacy in disease- or biomarker-defined cohorts of sufficient rigor to support accelerated approval.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of study selection. ASCO = American Society of Clinical Oncology; FDA = US Food and Drug Administration.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution of phase I/II trials. A) Distribution by number of patients and B) by number of clinical trials is shown. CT = clinical trial sample size.

References

    1. Thomas DW, Burns J, Audette J, Carroll A, Dow-Hygelund C, Hay M. Clinical development success rates 2006–2015. https://www.bio.org/sites/default/files/Clinical%20Development%20Success.... Published June 2016. Accessed December 8, 2017.
    1. DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG.. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2007;252:209–216. - PubMed
    1. Jardim DL, Schwaederle M, Hong DS, Kurzrock R.. An appraisal of drug development timelines in the Era of precision oncology. Oncotarget. 2016;733:53037–53046. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prowell TM, Theoret MR, Pazdur R.. Seamless oncology-drug development. N Engl J Med. 2016;37421:2001–2003. - PubMed
    1. Mullard A. Reining in the supersized phase I cancer trial. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;156:371–373. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances