Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec;11(12):e007055.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007055.

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Salvatore Cassese et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The optimal revascularization therapy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of femoropopliteal arteries represents a matter of debate. We investigated the outcomes of patients treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for ISR of femoropopliteal arteries.

Methods and results: Patient-level data from 3 randomized trials of DCB angioplasty for ISR of femoropopliteal arteries were pooled. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization. The main secondary outcome was recurrent ISR. Other outcomes of interest were ipsilateral amputation, death, Rutherford class improvement, and ankle-brachial index at follow-up. A total of 263 patients randomly assigned to DCB (n=133) or plain balloon angioplasty (n=130) were included in the analysis. After a follow-up of 12 months, patients treated with DCB angioplasty displayed a lower risk for target lesion revascularization (hazard ratio [95% CIs]: 0.25 [0.14-0.46]; P<0.001) and recurrent ISR (0.19 [0.10-0.35]; P<0.001) as compared with those treated with plain balloon angioplasty. There was no significant interaction between the treatment effect for target lesion revascularization and high-risk subgroups of patients such as those with diabetes mellitus, longer lesions, small vessels, moderate to severe underlying calcification, and occlusive pattern of ISR. DCB and plain balloon angioplasty were comparable with respect to other secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: In case of femoropopliteal ISR, the percutaneous treatment with DCB angioplasty is associated with superior clinical and antirestenotic efficacy as compared with plain balloon angioplasty at 1-year follow-up, without attrition of efficacy in high-risk subgroups of patients. The long-term durability of DCB angioplasty in this setting remains to be further investigated.

Keywords: angioplasty; ankle-brachial index; diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; stents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis.
    Rymer JA, Jones WS. Rymer JA, et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec;11(12):e007559. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007559. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30562092 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances