Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 19;2(3):bjgpopen18X101606.
doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101606. eCollection 2018 Oct.

The tip of the iceberg: finding patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care. An observational study

Affiliations

The tip of the iceberg: finding patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care. An observational study

Christi Deaton et al. BJGP Open. .

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is under-identified in primary care.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine what information is available in patients' primary care practice records that would identify patients with HFpEF.

Design & setting: Record review in two practices in east of England.

Method: Practices completed a case report form on each patient on the heart failure register and sent anonymised echocardiography reports on patients with an ejection fraction (EF) >50%. Reports were reviewed and data analysed using SPSS (version 25).

Results: One hundred and forty-eight patients on the heart failure registers with mean age 77 +12 years were reviewed. Fifty-three patients (36%) had possible HFpEF based on available information. These patients were older and multimorbid, with a high prevalence of overweight and obesity. Confirmation of diagnosis was not possible as recommended HFpEF diagnostic information (natriuretic peptides, echocardiogram parameters of structural heart disease and diastolic function) was widely inconsistent or absent in these patients.

Conclusion: Without correct identification of HFpEF, patient management may be suboptimal or inappropriate, and lack the needed focus on comorbidities and lifestyle that can improve patient outcomes. This study describes in detail the characteristics of many of the patients who probably have HFpEF in a real-world sample, and the improvements and diagnostic information required to better identify them. Identifying more than the tip of the iceberg that is the HFpEF population will allow the improvement of the quality of their management, the prevention of ineffective health care, and the recruitment of patients into research.

Keywords: delayed diagnosis; diagnosing heart failure; diagnostic tests; echocardiogram; heart failure; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Chronic heart failure: National Clinical Guideline for diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care [full version of the NICE clinical guideline No 108] London: National Clinical Guideline Centre; 2010.
    1. Donkor A, Cleland J, McDonagh T, et al. National Heart Failure Audit Steering Group National Heart Failure Audit. 2014. [accessed Sep 11;2018 ]. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/nicor/audits/heart failure/
    1. Lam CS, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E, et al. Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13(1):18–28. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq121. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borlaug BA. The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(9):507–515. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.83. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banerjee P. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A clinical crisis. Int J Cardiol. 2016;204:198–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.170. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources