Methodology to develop machine learning algorithms to improve performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy
- PMID: 30568383
- PMCID: PMC6288655
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i45.5057
Methodology to develop machine learning algorithms to improve performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Abstract
Assisted diagnosis using artificial intelligence has been a holy grail in medical research for many years, and recent developments in computer hardware have enabled the narrower area of machine learning to equip clinicians with potentially useful tools for computer assisted diagnosis (CAD) systems. However, training and assessing a computer's ability to diagnose like a human are complex tasks, and successful outcomes depend on various factors. We have focused our work on gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy because it is a cornerstone for diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the GI tract. About 2.8 million luminal GI (esophageal, stomach, colorectal) cancers are detected globally every year, and although substantial technical improvements in endoscopes have been made over the last 10-15 years, a major limitation of endoscopic examinations remains operator variation. This translates into a substantial inter-observer variation in the detection and assessment of mucosal lesions, causing among other things an average polyp miss-rate of 20% in the colon and thus the subsequent development of a number of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers. CAD systems might eliminate this variation and lead to more accurate diagnoses. In this editorial, we point out some of the current challenges in the development of efficient computer-based digital assistants. We give examples of proposed tools using various techniques, identify current challenges, and give suggestions for the development and assessment of future CAD systems.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Computer assisted diagnosis; Deep learning; Endoscopy; Gastrointestinal.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: de Lange T declares no conflict of interests; Halvorsen P reports grants from Norwegian Research Council during the conduct of the study; and grants from Norwegian Research Council outside the submitted work; Riegler M declares no conflict of interests.
References
-
- Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014;383:1490–1502. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization - International Agency for Research on Cancer. Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence world-wide in 2012. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx. 2012.
-
- Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
-
- Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Efficacy and effectiveness of colonoscopy: how do we bridge the gap? Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:673–684. - PubMed
-
- Lee SH, Jang BI, Kim KO, Jeon SW, Kwon JG, Kim EY, Jung JT, Park KS, Cho KB, Kim ES, et al. Endoscopic experience improves interobserver agreement in the grading of esophagitis by Los Angeles classification: conventional endoscopy and optimal band image system. Gut Liver. 2014;8:154–159. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
