Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul;15(3):e12768.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.12768. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

A review of pregnancy iPhone apps assessing their quality, inclusion of behaviour change techniques, and nutrition information

Hannah M Brown  1   2 , Tamara Bucher  1   2 , Clare E Collins  1   2 , Megan E Rollo  1   2
Affiliations
Review

A review of pregnancy iPhone apps assessing their quality, inclusion of behaviour change techniques, and nutrition information

Hannah M Brown et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Smartphone apps for use in pregnancy are common and could influence lifestyle behaviours, but they have not been evaluated. This review aimed to assess the quality of iPhone pregnancy apps and whether they included behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and/or pregnancy-specific nutrition information. A keyword search of the Australian iTunes app store was conducted. For inclusion, apps had to be available at no cost, in English, intended for use by pregnant women, and contain nutrition information. App quality was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). Absence or presence of BCTs was assessed using the CALO-RE taxonomy, with type of nutrition information included also reported. The initial key word search identified 607 apps, with 51 iPhone apps included in final evaluation. Mean overall MARS quality rating score was 3.05 out of 5 (1 = inadequate; 5 = excellent). The functionality subscale scored highest (mean = 3.32), and aesthetics scored lowest (mean = 2.87). Out of a possible 40 BCTs, 11 were present across the apps with a median of three BCTs (range: 0-6) identified per app. The median number of pregnancy-specific nutrition topics per app was three (range 0 to 7). Despite the availability of a large number of iPhone pregnancy apps, few are of high quality, with only a small number of BCTs used and limited inclusion of pregnancy-specific nutrition information. It is important to be aware of limitations within current pregnancy apps before recommending usage during this key life stage.

Keywords: app quality; apps; behaviour change techniques; iPhone; maternal nutrition; pregnancy and nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of app inclusion process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abroms, L. C. , Padmanabhan, N. , Thaweethai, L. , & Phillips, T. (2011). iPhone apps for smoking cessation: A content analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 279–285. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.032 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson, K. , Burford, O. , & Emmerton, L. (2016). Mobile health apps to facilitate self‐care: A qualitative study of user experiences. PLoS One, 11(5), e0156164 10.1371/journal.pone.0156164 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashman, A. M. , Collins, C. E. , Brown, L. J. , Rae, K. M. , & Rollo, M. E. (2016). A brief tool to assess image‐based dietary records and guide nutrition counselling among pregnant women: An evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 4(4), e123 10.2196/mhealth.6469 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Government Department of Health . (2014, July 2014). Information for health professionals on pregnancy and alcohol. Retrieved from http://www.alcohol.gov.au/internet/alcohol/publishing.nsf/Content/wwtk‐h...
    1. Azar, K. M. , Lesser, L. I. , Laing, B. Y. , Stephens, J. , Aurora, M. S. , Burke, L. E. , & Palaniappan, L. P. (2013). Mobile applications for weight management: Theory‐based content analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(5), 583–589. 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.005 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms