Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;34(6):306-311.
doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.07. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Hartmann Colostomy Reversal

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Hartmann Colostomy Reversal

Won Park et al. Ann Coloproctol. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Hartmann operation is widely recognized as a useful procedure, especially in emergencies involving the rectosigmoid colon. One of the surgeon's foremost concerns after Hartmann operation is future colostomy reversal, as colostomy reversal after a Hartmann procedure is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic surgical techniques continue to prove useful for an ever-increasing variety of indications. We analyzed the outcomes of laparoscopic Hartmann colostomy reversals at our center.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the hospital records of 170 patients who had undergone Hartmann operation between January 2010 and June 2017 at Wonkwang University Hospital. Among 68 Hartmann colostomy reversals, we evaluated and compared the outcomes of 3 groups of patients: 29 patients in the open colostomy reversal group (OG) who had undergone laparotomies for Hartmann reversals, 19 patients in the conversion group (CG) whose laparoscopic procedures had required conversion to a laparotomy, and 20 patients in the laparoscopy group (LG).

Results: The overall reversal rate for Hartmann colostomies was 40.5% during this time period. The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter among LG patients (10.15 ± 2.94 days) than among OG patients (16 ± 9.5 days). The overall complication rate among OG patients was higher than that among LG patients (adjusted odds ratio, 8.78; P = 0.01). The most common complication was postoperative ileus (19.1%).

Conclusion: If no contraindications to laparoscopy exist, surgeons should favor a laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann operation over an open reversal.

Keywords: Colostomy; Hartmann operation; Laparoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart describing the selection of patients included in this study.

References

    1. Hartmann H. Note sur un procédé nouveau d’extirpation des cancers de la partie terminale du côlon. Bull Mem Soc Chir Paris. 1923;49:1474–7.
    1. Cellini C, Deeb AP, Sharma A, Monson JR, Fleming FJ. Association between operative approach and complications in patients undergoing Hartmann’s reversal. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1094–9. - PubMed
    1. Maitra RK, Pinkney TD, Mohiuddin MK, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Williams JP, Acheson AG. Should laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure be the first line approach in all patients? Int J Surg. 2013;11:971–6. - PubMed
    1. Park JM, Chi KC. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;82:256–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walklett CL, Yeomans NP. A retrospective case note review of laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:539–42. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources