Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):44.
doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0183-1.

Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion

Antonella F Lavelanet  1 , Stephanie Schlitt  2 , Brooke Ronald Johnson Jr  3 , Bela Ganatra  3
Affiliations

Global Abortion Policies Database: a descriptive analysis of the legal categories of lawful abortion

Antonella F Lavelanet et al. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. .

Abstract

Background: Texts and interpretations on the lawfulness of abortion and associated administrative requirements can be vague and confusing. It can also be difficult for a woman or provider to know exactly where to look for and how to interpret laws on abortion. To increase transparency, the Global Abortion Policies Database (GAPD), launched in 2017, facilitates the strengthening of knowledge and understanding of the complexities and nuances around lawful abortion as explicitly stated in laws and policies.

Methods: We report on data available in the GAPD as of May 2018. We reviewed the content and wording of laws, policies, standards and guidelines, judgments and other official statements for all countries where data is available in the GAPD. We analyzed data for 158 countries, where abortion is lawful on the woman's request with no requirement for justification and/or for at least one legal ground, including additional indications that are nonequivalent to a single common legal ground. We classified laws on the basis of the explicit wording of the text. The GAPD treats legal categories as the circumstances under which abortion is lawful, that is, allowed or not contrary to law, or explicitly permitted or specified by law.

Results: 32% of countries allow or permit abortion at the woman's request with no requirement for justification. Approximately 82% of countries allow or permit abortion to save the woman's life. 64% of countries specify health, physical health and/or mental (or psychological) health. 51% allow or permit abortion based on a fetal condition, 46% of countries allow or permit abortion where the pregnancy is the result of rape, and 10% specify an economic or social ground. Laws may also specify several additional indications that are nonequivalent to a single legal ground.

Conclusions: The GAPD reflects details that exist within countries' laws and highlights the nuance within legal categories of abortion; no assumptions are made as to how laws are interpreted or applied in practice. By examining the text of the law, additional complexities related to the legal categories of abortion become more apparent.

Keywords: Abortion laws; Abortion legal categories; Abortion on request; Indications for abortion; Lawful abortion; Legal grounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

BRJ and AFL are staff members in the World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research and the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), involved in the management of the Global Abortion Policies Database. SS is an HRP consultant who provides technical support for GAPD updates. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of, and should not be attributed to, the World Health Organization.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship between health, physical health and/or mental health ground and related indications
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between a ground based on fetal condition and related indications
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between rape ground and related indications
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relationship between economic or social ground and related indications
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. David H. Abortion in Europe, 1920-91: a public health perspective. Stud Fam Plan. 1992;23:1–22. doi: 10.2307/1966824. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reagan LJ. When abortion was a crime: women, medicine, and law in the United States, 1867–1973. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997.
    1. Hessini L. Abortion and Islam: policies and practice in the Middle East and North Africa. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15:75–84. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(06)29279-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonbol A. Women, the family and divorce laws in Islamic history. New York: Syracuse: University Press; 1996.
    1. Resolution WHA20.41. Health aspects of population dynamics. In: Twentieth world health assembly, Geneva, 1967. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1967 (WHA20/1967/REC/1).

Publication types