Outcomes Among Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents: Analysis From the BIONICS Randomized Trial
- PMID: 30573057
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.033
Outcomes Among Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents: Analysis From the BIONICS Randomized Trial
Abstract
Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes following contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the BIONICS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis) trial.
Background: Patients with DM are at increased risk for adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods: A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate in a noninferiority design the safety and efficacy of ridaforolimus-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents among 1,919 patients undergoing PCI. Randomization was stratified to the presence of medically treated DM, and a pre-specified analysis compared outcomes according to the presence or absence of DM up to 2 years.
Results: The overall prevalence of DM was 29.1% (559 of 1,919). DM patients had higher body mass index, greater prevalence of hyperlipidemia and hypertension, and smaller reference vessel diameter. One-year target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) was significantly higher among diabetic patients (7.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.002), mainly due to higher target lesion revascularization (4.5% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.002). Rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis did not statistically vary. Among 158 patients undergoing 13-month angiographic follow-up, restenosis rates were 3 times higher in diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic patients (15.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.01). Clinical and angiographic outcomes were similar between ridaforolimus-eluting stent- and zotarolimus-eluting stent-treated patients.
Conclusions: Despite advances in interventional therapies, and the implementation of new-generation DES, diabetic patients still have worse angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with nondiabetic patients undergoing PCI.
Keywords: clinical outcomes; diabetes; percutaneous coronary intervention; ridaforolimus-eluting stent(s).
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
The Challenge of Diabetes Mellitus in the Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era: Are We Making Progress?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2477-2479. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.027. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 30573058 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized Comparison of Ridaforolimus-Eluting and Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: 2-Year Clinical Outcomes From the BIONICS and NIREUS Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 13;13(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.019. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 31918946
-
Comparison of Ridaforolimus-Eluting and Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: 5-Year Outcomes From the BIONICS and NIREUS Trials.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 19;13(22):e036210. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036210. Epub 2024 Nov 15. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 39547969 Free PMC article.
-
5-Year Outcome Following Randomized Treatment of All-Comers With Zotarolimus-Eluting Resolute Integrity and Everolimus-Eluting PROMUS Element Coronary Stents: Final Report of the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) Trial.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 12;11(5):462-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.11.031. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29519378 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical Outcomes of the Dual-Therapy CD34 Antibody-Covered Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Standard Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents: A Meta-Analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 17. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020. PMID: 31147259
-
Comparison of drug-eluting and bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: what is the evidence?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):112-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt454. Epub 2013 Oct 20. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24144807 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon in Coronary Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Study.J Diabetes Res. 2021 Jul 29;2021:5495219. doi: 10.1155/2021/5495219. eCollection 2021. J Diabetes Res. 2021. PMID: 34368364 Free PMC article.
-
Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds and metallic stents in diabetic patients: a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux Study, TWENTE and DUTCH PEERS.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Oct 2;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01116-2. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020. PMID: 33008407 Free PMC article.
-
Association between diabetes mellitus and primary restenosis following endovascular treatment: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Apr 22;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02201-6. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 38650038 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis From Two Indian Registries.Cureus. 2023 Jul 11;15(7):e41743. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41743. eCollection 2023 Jul. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37575772 Free PMC article.
-
Intracoronary physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes.Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1331-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02243-y. Epub 2023 Jun 20. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37338598 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous