Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 15;294(7):2386-2396.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006226. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

Interleukin 34 (IL-34) cell-surface localization regulated by the molecular chaperone 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein facilitates the differentiation of monocytic cells

Affiliations

Interleukin 34 (IL-34) cell-surface localization regulated by the molecular chaperone 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein facilitates the differentiation of monocytic cells

Sayaka Ogawa et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Interleukin 34 (IL-34) constitutes a cytokine that shares a common receptor, colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R), with CSF-1. We recently identified a novel type of monocytic cell termed follicular dendritic cell-induced monocytic cells (FDMCs), whose differentiation depended on CSF-1R signaling through the IL-34 produced from a follicular dendritic cell line, FL-Y. Here, we report the functional mechanisms of the IL-34-mediated CSF-1R signaling underlying FDMC differentiation. CRIPSR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the Il34 gene confirmed that the ability of FL-Y cells to induce FDMCs completely depends on the IL-34 expressed by FL-Y cells. Transwell culture experiments revealed that FDMC differentiation requires a signal from a membrane-anchored form of IL-34 on the FL-Y cell surface, but not from a secreted form, in a direct interaction between FDMC precursor cells and FL-Y cells. Furthermore, flow cytometric analysis using an anti-IL-34 antibody indicated that IL-34 was also expressed on the FL-Y cell surface. Thus, we explored proteins interacting with IL-34 in FL-Y cells. Mass spectrometry analysis and pulldown assay identified that IL-34 was associated with the molecular chaperone 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) in the plasma membrane fraction of FL-Y cells. Consistent with this finding, GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells expressed a lower level of IL-34 protein on their cell surface and exhibited a reduced competency to induce FDMC differentiation compared with the original FL-Y cells. These results indicated a novel GRP78-dependent localization and specific function of IL-34 in FL-Y cells related to monocytic cell differentiation.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas; GRP78; Western blot; cell differentiation; cell surface protein; chaperone; colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor; cytokine; follicular dendritic cell; interleukin; interleukin 34; monocyte; plasma membrane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Role of IL-34 in FDMC differentiation. A, gene targeting strategy for establishing IL-34 KO FL-Y cells. Exon 3 of the Il34 gene was replaced with the puromycin-resistance marker gene (puror) and the blasticidin S–resistance gene (BSR). Open arrowheads show primer pairs used for detecting successful recombination. B, genomic PCR analysis of the Il34 allele in FL-Y cells. Genome DNA was prepared from IL-34 KO FL-Y cells and analyzed by PCR. Il34 KO alleles were identified using indicated primer pairs (F/puro or F/BSR2). Closed arrowheads on the right show PCR products with the expected sizes. C, RT-PCR analysis of Il34 mRNA expression in IL-34 KO FL-Y cells. mRNA was isolated from WT FL-Y and IL-34 KO FL-Y cells (clones 1–3), and Il34 transcript was amplified by RT-PCR. Alternatively, an exon 3-specific primer (ex3F) was also used to amplify the Il34 transcripts. Closed arrowheads on the right show a PCR product with the expected size. The open arrowhead shows smaller PCR products than the expected one. D, T cell– and adherent cell–depleted splenocytes (1 × 106) from BALB/c mice were cultured with 1 × 104 cells of FL-Y or IL-34 KO FL-Y or without FL-Y (−) for 10 days. Cultured cells were collected and analyzed by flow cytometry after staining for CD11b. The percentage of CD11b+ cells is indicated. E, the number of generated FDMCs in each culture was calculated from the percentage of CD11b+ cells in the total number of viable cells in D. F, T cell– and adherent cell–depleted splenocytes (1 × 106) from BALB/c mice were cultured with 1 × 104 cells of FL-Y in the presence or absence of GW2580 (1 μm). The number of CD11b+ cells was determined as shown in D and E. The data are presented as the means ± S.D. of triplicate cultures. The data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Statistical differences are marked: **, p < 0.01 versus FL-Y; ***, p < 0.005 versus the DMSO control.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Involvement of cell-surface IL-34 in FDMC differentiation. A, in the Transwell culture, 1 × 104 FL-Y cells were seeded to the lower chamber, and T cell– and adherent cell–depleted splenocytes (1 × 106 cells) from BALB/c mice were added to the upper chamber separated by a 0.45-μm-pore size membrane. After 9 days, the number of CD11b+ cells in the upper chamber was estimated by flow cytometry. The data are presented as the means ± S.D. of triplicate cultures. Statistical differences are marked: *, p < 0.05 versus intact culture condition for FDMC induction of FL-Y cells. B, T cell– and adherent cell–depleted splenocytes (1 × 106) from BALB/c mice were cultured with 2 × 105 cells of the original FL-Y (FL-Y) or IL-34 KO FL-Y (IL-34 KO) cells, each of which was pretreated with (+) or without (−) 0.1% PFA. After 10 days, the cultured cells were analyzed by flow cytometry after staining for CD11b. The data are presented as the means ± S.D. of triplicate cultures. Statistical differences are marked: **, p < 0.01 versus the original FL-Y treated with PFA. C, IL-34 expression on the cell surface of the FL-Y cell line was determined by flow cytometry (left panels) after staining with isotype IgG (shaded) or anti–IL-34 antibody (red line). The level of IL-34 surface expression is indicated as the ΔMFI value, which was calculated by subtracting the MFI value of the isotype-matched control from that of each sample (right panel). The data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Max, maximum.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Establishment of FL-Y cells expressing Strep-tagged IL-34. A, immunoblot analysis of IL-34 in FL-Y, FL-Y–IL-34–Nst (IL-34-Nst), and IL-34 KO FL-Y (IL-34 KO) cells. Whole cell lysates were subjected to Western blotting analysis using anti–IL-34, anti–Strep-tag, and anti–β-actin Abs. β-Actin was used as an internal control. The blots are representative of at least three independent experiments. Arrows indicate IL-34–Nst. B, flow cytometric analysis of FL-Y cells after staining with anti–IL-34 or anti–Strep-tag Abs (red line). Negative controls that were stained with an isotype-matched control Ab are shown in gray histograms. C, T cell– and adherent cell–depleted splenocytes (1 × 106) from BALB/c mice were cultured with 2 × 105 cells of WT FL-Y, FL-Y–IL-34–Nst (IL-34-Nst), and IL-34 KO FL-Y (IL-34 KO) cells that were pretreated with 0.1% paraformaldehyde. After 8 days, the cultured cells were analyzed by flow cytometry after staining for CD11b. The data are representative of at least three independent experiments. The data are presented as the means ± S.D. of triplicate cultures. Statistical differences are marked: **, p < 0.01 versus FL-Y; *, p < 0.05 versus FL-Y.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Interaction of IL-34 with GRP78 in the plasma membrane of FL-Y cells. A, immunoblot analysis of the plasma membrane fraction prepared from FL-Y–IL-34–Nst (IL-34-Nst) and IL-34 KO FL-Y (IL-34 KO) cells. Plasma membrane fractions extracted from the indicated cells were subjected to Western blotting analysis using anti–IL-34 and anti–Strep-tag Abs. VCAM was used as an internal control. Arrows indicate IL-34–Nst. B, silver staining of IL-34 and proteins associated with IL-34. IL-34–Nst proteins in the plasma membrane fraction prepared from FL-Y–IL-34 (IL-34) and FL-Y–IL-34–Nst (IL-34-Nst) cells were pulled down by using the Strep-Tactin Sepharose resin and eluted by 2.5 mm desthiobiotin. Plasma membrane fractions (Input), eluted fractions with desthiobiotin (EF), and residual fractions on the resin (RF) were subjected to SDS-PAGE. C, GRP78 was bound to IL-34–Nst in the plasma membrane fraction. The plasma membrane fraction of FL-Y–IL-34–Nst cells was mixed with control (Cont) or Strep-Tactin (ST) Sepharose, and bound molecules were eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer for Western blotting with anti-GRP78 Ab. D, plasma membrane fraction of FL-Y–IL-34 (IL-34) and FL-Y–IL-34–Nst (IL-34-Nst) cells was reacted with Strep-Tactin Sepharose, and binding molecules were eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer for Western blotting with anti-GRP78 Ab. E, recombinant GST or GST–GRP78 was mixed with the whole cell lysate of FL-Y–IL-34–Nst cells and precipitated with glutathione-Sepharose. Eluted fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting analysis.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells exhibit reduced FDMC-inducing activity. A, gene targeting strategy for establishing GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells. Open arrowheads show primer pairs used for detecting successful recombination. B, genomic PCR analysis of the Grp78 gene in WT (+/+) and GRP78-heterozygous (+/−) FL-Y cells. Genome DNA was prepared from GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells (clones 1 and 2) and amplified by PCR. The Grp78 KO allele was identified using indicated primer pairs (F/puro and r-plox/R). C, RT-PCR analysis of Grp78 mRNA expression in GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells (clones 1 and 2). RNA was isolated from WT and GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells (clones 1 and 2), and the Grp78 transcript was amplified by RT-PCR. D, Western blotting analysis of GRP78 expressed in FL-Y and GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells (clones 1 and 2). Whole cell lysates prepared from FL-Y and GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells (clones 1 and 2) were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blotting. E, IL-34 expression on the cell surface of the GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cell line was determined by flow cytometry after staining with an anti–IL-34 antibody as shown in Fig. 2C. The level of IL-34 cell-surface expression is indicated as described for Fig. 2C (ΔMFI). F, competency of GRP78-heterozygous FL-Y cells for inducing FDMC differentiation. T cell– and adherent cell–depleted splenocytes (1 × 106) from BALB/c mice were cultured with FL-Y and GRP78-heterozygous (±) FL-Y (clones 1 and 2) that were pretreated with 0.1% paraformaldehyde as shown in Fig. 2B. Cultured cells were collected and analyzed by flow cytometry after staining for CD11b. The data are presented as the means ± S.D. of triplicate cultures. The data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Statistical differences are marked: *, p < 0.05 versus original FL-Y (+/+).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hume D. A. (2008) Macrophages as APC and the dendritic cell myth. J. Immunol. 181, 5829–5835 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.5829 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wei S., Nandi S., Chitu V., Yeung Y.-G., Yu W., Huang M., Williams L. T., Lin H., and Stanley E. R. (2010) Functional overlap but differential expression of CSF-1 and IL-34 in their CSF-1 receptor-mediated regulation of myeloid cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 88, 495–505 10.1189/jlb.1209822 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garceau V., Smith J., Paton I. R., Davey M., Fares M. A., Sester D. P., Burt D. W., and Hume D. A. (2010) Pivotal advance: avian colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), interleukin-34 (IL-34), and CSF-1 receptor genes and gene products. J. Leukoc. Biol. 87, 753–764 10.1189/jlb.0909624 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamilton J. A., and Achuthan A. (2013) Colony stimulating factors and myeloid cell biology in health and disease. Trends Immunol. 34, 81–89 10.1016/j.it.2012.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knowlton M. L., Selfors L. M., Wrobel C. N., Gu T. L., Ballif B. A., Gygi S. P., Polakiewicz R., and Brugge J. S. (2010) Profiling Y561-dependent and -independent substrates of CSF-1R in epithelial cells. PLoS One 5, e13587 10.1371/journal.pone.0013587 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types