Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb;15(2):113-124.
doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0110-z.

Immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis in the era of biologics

Affiliations
Review

Immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis in the era of biologics

Marinos C Dalakas. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

No consensus has been reached on the ideal therapeutic algorithm for myasthenia gravis (MG). Most patients with MG require induction therapy with high doses of corticosteroids and maintenance with an immunosuppressant. Severe cases and acute worsening require intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis before oral immunosuppressants start having an effect. However, biologics are emerging as important therapeutic tools that promise to provide better corticosteroid sparing effects than standard treatments and can even induce remission. In particular, eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody against complement C5, has been approved by the FDA for refractory MG on the basis of a phase III trial. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that depletes peripheral B cells, has also been effective in many large uncontrolled series, although was not in a small phase III trial. Whether the newer anti-CD20 agents ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, ublituximab or inebilizumab will be more effective remains unclear. Belimumab, an antibody against the B cell trophic factor BAFF, was ineffective in phase III trials, and efgartigimod, which depletes antibodies, was effective in a phase II study. Some anti-cytokine agents relevant to MG immunopathogenesis also seem promising. Checkpoint inhibitors can trigger MG in some patients, necessitating early intervention. Increased availability of new biologics provides targeted immunotherapies and the opportunities to develop more specific therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gilhus, N. E. Myasthenia gravis. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2570–2581 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Dalakas, M. C. Future perspectives in target-specific immunotherapies of myasthenia gravis. Therap. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 8, 316–327 (2015).
    1. Guptil, J. T., Soni, M. & Meriggioli, M. N. Current treatment, emerging translational therapies, and new therapeutic targets for autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Neurotherapeutics 13, 118–131 (2016).
    1. Drachman, D. B. Myasthenia gravis. Semin. Neurol. 36, 419–424 (2016). A useful overview from a very experienced clinician and MG scholar. - PubMed
    1. Sanders, D. B. et al. International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: executive summary. Neurology 87, 419–425 (2016). An important effort to establish consensus criteria in the treatment of MG. - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources