Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;27(4):637-646.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0312-2. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

A game of hide and seq: Identification of parallel Y-STR evolution in deep-rooting pedigrees

Affiliations

A game of hide and seq: Identification of parallel Y-STR evolution in deep-rooting pedigrees

Sofie Claerhout et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Short tandem repeats on the Y-chromosome (Y-STRs) are common DNA polymorphisms useful for genetic genealogy, population and evolutionary genetics, human genetics, pathology and forensic sciences. It is important to identify all Y-STR variants and to have knowledge of Y-STR mutation rates in order to correctly estimate the time to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) between paternally related individuals. When capillary electrophoresis (CE) is performed to analyze genealogical pairs, Y-STR sequence variations remain hidden when the number of repeats is identical. These hidden variations could be due to parallel Y-STR changes or modifications (PM) that occur independently in different lineages leading to alleles with identical number of repeats. In this study, we detect for the first time twelve PM by analyzing 133 males (960 meiosis) in extended deep-rooting family pedigrees on 42 Y-STRs. These PM were observed in nine Y-STR loci with mutation rates of at least 5.94 × 10-3 per generation. Sequencing analysis made it possible to distinguish insertions/deletions in different repeat regions revealing the presence of two unique changes in three PM on rapidly mutating and complex Y-STRs DYS724-ab and DYS518. Sequencing unraveled more information concerning the identity of alleles, and increased allelic discrimination possibilities which is of great importance in population genetics and forensic analysis. Limiting the analysis to CE could lead to wrong ancestral allele assumptions, to false negative interpretations and to tMRCA underestimations. These observations highlight the importance and added value of sequencing analysis and suggest a shift in genotyping methods from CE to next generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pedigree1 contains 28 judicially related males whereof 24 males are biologically related. Four relatives (crossed) were excluded due to the presence of an interruption in their Y-chromosome lineage. All Y-STR changes are listed whereby the five PM for DYS724-ab, DYS458, DYS518 (x2) and DYS627 (resp. PM1, PM2, PM3, PM4 and PM5) are indicated in shades of gray; asterisk (*) equal number of repeats as relative 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CE analysis for DYS518 resulted in a dilemma for PM10 in Pedigree3 containing 10 patrilineal relatives whereof two are excluded due to an interruption in their Y-chromosome lineage. a The MRCA allele contains 37 repeats and the location of a parallel gain of repeat is indicated in black. b The MRCA allele contains 38 repeats and the location of a parallel loss of repeat is indicated in black
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Assumptions on the position of Y-STR changes in the paternal line based on CE and sequencing of PM13 in Pedigree28. a Through CE genotyping a gain of repeat located in the paternal line of relative 1 was assumed. b DYS518 repeat motif sequence discrimination (underlined). c Sequencing analysis revealed the identification of two different loss of repeats located in the paternal line of both relative 2 and 3

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tilanus MGJ. Short tandem repeat markers in diagnostics: What’s in a repeat? Leukemia. 2006;20:1353–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404273. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunstein J. STR typing: method and application. Med Lab Obs Mlo. 2014;46:40–2. - PubMed
    1. Barra GB, Santa Rita TH, Chianca CF, et al. Fetal male lineage determination by analysis of Y-chromosome STR haplotype in maternal plasma. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;15:105–10. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calafell F, Larmuseau MHD. The Y chromosome as the most popular marker in genetic genealogy benefits interdisciplinary research. Hum Genet. 2017;136:559–73. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1740-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roewer L. Y chromosome STR typing in crime casework. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009;5:77–84. doi: 10.1007/s12024-009-9089-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types