Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;5(4):272-278.
doi: 10.1177/2374373518759548. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

Providers' Perceptions of Barriers to Optimal Communication With Patients During the Postcolonoscopy Experience

Affiliations

Providers' Perceptions of Barriers to Optimal Communication With Patients During the Postcolonoscopy Experience

Travis Hyams et al. J Patient Exp. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Colonoscopy screening is an effective method of detecting and preventing colorectal cancer. Standard procedure for most colonoscopies (98%) is to use conscious sedation, which can cause short-term cognitive impairment postprocedure, including communication difficulties. In this study, we explored providers' (gastroenterology doctors and nurses) perceptions of the barriers to optimal communication with patients immediately following colonoscopy.

Methods: We conducted interviews with 61 providers across 5 clinical configurations. Interviews were transcribed and coded with NVivo version 11 software.

Results: Themes emerged regarding barriers to optimal provider-patient communication postcolonoscopy: patient barriers (sedation and patient characteristics), caregiver barriers, and system characteristics.

Conclusions: Providers' perceived barriers to communication are an important topic to study. They endorsed, in particular, interventions that target the postcolonoscopy time frame when patients may still be sedated, but providers must convey important discharge and follow-up instructions.

Keywords: colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; patient–provider communication; screening; sedation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Epstein RM, Street RL., Jr. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, NIH Publication; No. 07-6225; 2007.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System For The 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Ha JF, Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J. 2010;10:38–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB, Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;7:903–18. - PubMed
    1. Katz ML, James AS, Pigone MP, Hudson MA, Jackson E, Oates V, et al. Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:62 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-4-62. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources