Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):213-223.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5849.

Association of Corticosteroid Treatment With Outcomes in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association of Corticosteroid Treatment With Outcomes in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Fang Fang et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Importance: Although corticosteroids are widely used for adults with sepsis, both the overall benefit and potential risks remain unclear.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in patients with sepsis.

Data sources and study selection: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception until March 20, 2018, and updated on August 10, 2018. The terms corticosteroids, sepsis, septic shock, hydrocortisone, controlled trials, and randomized controlled trial were searched alone or in combination. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included that compared administration of corticosteroids with placebo or standard supportive care in adults with sepsis.

Data extraction and synthesis: Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% CIs. Two independent reviewers completed citation screening, data abstraction, and risk assessment.

Main outcomes and measures: Twenty-eight-day mortality.

Results: This meta-analysis included 37 RCTs (N = 9564 patients). Eleven trials were rated as low risk of bias. Corticosteroid use was associated with reduced 28-day mortality (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; I2 = 27%) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94; I2 = 0%) and in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99; I2 = 38%). Corticosteroids were significantly associated with increased shock reversal at day 7 (MD, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.80-3.11) and vasopressor-free days (MD, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.80-3.11) and with ICU length of stay (MD, -1.16; 95% CI, -2.12 to -0.20), the sequential organ failure assessment score at day 7 (MD, -1.38; 95% CI, -1.87 to -0.89), and time to resolution of shock (MD, -1.35; 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.91). However, corticosteroid use was associated with increased risk of hyperglycemia (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08-1.30) and hypernatremia (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.24-1.99).

Conclusions and relevance: The findings suggest that administration of corticosteroids is associated with reduced 28-day mortality compared with placebo use or standard supportive care. More research is needed to associate personalized medicine with the corticosteroid treatment to select suitable patients who are more likely to show a benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of the Search Strategy and Included Studies
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mortality at 28 Days in All Trials Evaluating Corticosteroids Among Patients With Sepsis
The risk ratios (RRs) were determined using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Square data markers represent RRs, with marker size reflecting the statistical weight of the study using random-effects meta-analysis; horizontal lines, 95% CIs; diamond, the overall RR and 95% CI for the outcome of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. ; Sepsis Definitions Task Force . Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):775-787. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0289 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. . Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762-774. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0288 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, et al. ; International Forum of Acute Care Trialists . Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(3):259-272. doi:10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walkey AJ, Lagu T, Lindenauer PK. Trends in sepsis and infection sources in the United States: a population-based study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(2):216-220. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-498BC - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types