Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 1;111(8):820-827.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy192.

Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results

Affiliations

Role of Screening History in Clinical Meaning and Optimal Management of Positive Cervical Screening Results

Philip E Castle et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is caused by persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. US consensus management guidelines for a positive cervical screening result typically focus on the current screening result only. A negative testing history may alter risk of the following positive screening results, caused by a new HPV infection, and therefore its optimal management.

Methods: Women ages 30 years and older were screened with triennial HPV and cytology co-testing at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2003 to 2014. We estimated the subsequent 5-year risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more severe diagnoses (CIN3+) in a cohort of 1 156 387 women following abnormal (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US] or worse) cytology and/or positive HPV testing, when the test result followed 0 (n = 990 013), 1 (n = 543 986), 2 (n = 245 974), or 3 (n = 79 946) consecutive negative co-test(s). All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Following 0-3 successive negative co-tests, 5-year CIN3+ risks following a positive HPV test decreased progressively from 7.2% (95% CI = 7.0% to 7.4%) to 1.5% (95% CI = 0.7% to 3.4%) (Ptrend < .001). Similarly, risks following an abnormal (ASC-US or worse) cytology result decreased from 6.6% (95% CI = 6.4% to 6.9%) to 1.1% (95% CI = 0.5% to 2.3%) (Ptrend < .001). Risks following low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, the risk threshold for referral to colposcopy in the United States, decreased from 5.2% (95% CI = 4.7% to 5.7%) to 0.9% (95% CI = 0.2% to 4.3%). Risks following high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or more severe, a specific marker for the presence of precancerous lesions, decreased from 50.0% (95% CI = 47.5% to 52.5%) to 10.0% (95% CI = 2.6% to 34.4%).

Conclusions: Following one or more sequential antecedent, documented negative co-tests or HPV tests, women with HPV-positive ASC-US or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion might have sufficiently low CIN3+ risk that they do not need colposcopy referral and might instead undergo 6-12-month surveillance for evidence of higher risk before being referred to colposcopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A diagram of the inclusions/exclusions by round of screening. A positive co-test was a positive HPV test and/or a positive cytology (ASC-US or more severe cytology) and a negative co-test was a negative HPV test and negative cytology. The gray-shaded boxes indicate the study groups of the first, second, third, and fourth positive co-tests following 0–3 consecutive negative co-tests, respectively. AGC = atypical glandular cells; ASC-H = atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out HSIL; ASC-US = atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; CIN2 = cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (CIN2+); HPV = human papillomavirus; HSIL+ = high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or more severe; LSIL = low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Diagnostic yield of CIN3+ by round of screening. Five-year cumulative detection (risk) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or more severe diagnoses CIN3+, irrespective of screening result, for the first, second, third, and fourth co-test, following 0–3 negative co-tests. Bars show 95% CIs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Walboomers JMM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;1891:12–19. - PubMed
    1. Castle PE, Rodriguez AC, Burk RD, et al. Short term persistence of human papillomavirus and risk of cervical precancer and cancer: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2009;3392:b2569.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kjær SK, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Iftner T.. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;10219:1478–1488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castle PE, Kinney WK, Xue X, et al. Effect of several negative rounds of human papillomavirus and cytology co-testing on safety against cervical cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2018;1681:20–29. - PubMed
    1. Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, et al. Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol. 2011;127:663–672. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms