Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;102(2):153-159.
doi: 10.1007/s00128-018-2515-1. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

Assessing Compliance of European Fresh Waters for Copper: Accounting for Bioavailability

Affiliations

Assessing Compliance of European Fresh Waters for Copper: Accounting for Bioavailability

Adam Peters et al. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

This study determines the levels of compliance of European fresh waters with a bioavailability-based copper Environmental Quality Standard (EQS). A tiered approach for compliance assessment is used at which the first tier compares the dissolved metal concentration to a threshold, estimated using either regional or continental water chemistry data. At the second tier, the bioavailable metal concentration is calculated using the chemistry of the water body, and compared to the EQSbioavailable for copper. The thresholds at Tier 1 must be set at a level to ensure adequate protection of sensitive environments and to ensure efficient use of regulatory resources. Compliance of 99.3% is observed where bioavailability-based thresholds are used for the implementation derived from regionally relevant water chemistry data. Sites where elevated ambient background levels of copper are combined with high bioavailability (waters with low dissolved organic carbon) are those most likely to be at risk from copper exposures.

Keywords: Bioavailability; Compliance assessment; Copper; Environmental quality standard; Water framework directive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sensitivity of European surface waters towards copper, from the FOREGS database (Salminen et al. 2005). Coloured points indicate the sensitivity of each site towards copper, as quantified by the thresholds for dissolved copper (µg L−1)

References

    1. Baken S, Cooper C, Van Assche F, Schlekat C, Chowdhury J, Bortoluzzi A, Stubblefield B, Vercaigne I, Verdonck F (2017) BIO-MET v4.0—a tool for metal bioavailability under the EU Water Framework Directive, SETAC Europe conference 2017, Brussels, May
    1. Comber SDW, Merrington G, Sturdy L, Delbeke K, van Assche F. Copper and zinc water quality standards under the EU water framework Directive: the use of a tiered approach to estimate the levels of failure. Sci Tot Env. 2008;403:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crane M, Fisher B, Leake C, Nathail P, Peters A, Stubblefield W, Warn T. Derivation and use of environmental quality and human health standards for chemical substances in water and soil. Boca Raton: SETAC CRC Press; 2010. How should an environmental standard be implemented. Chapter; p. 140.
    1. De Schamphelaere K, Janssen C. Development and field validation of a biotic ligand model predicting chronic copper toxicity to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004;23:1365–1375. doi: 10.1897/02-626. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Schamphelaere K, Vasconcelos F, Heijerick D, Tack F, Delbeke K, Allen H, Janssen C. Development and field validation of copper toxicity model for the green alga Raphidocelis subspicata. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003;22:2454–2465. doi: 10.1897/02-499. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources