Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;100(8):1442-1449.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.125. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Improved Work-Disability Functional Assessment Battery

Affiliations

Psychometric Evaluation of the Improved Work-Disability Functional Assessment Battery

Mark Meterko et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To assess psychometric properties of the improved Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB 2.0).

Design: Longitudinal study.

Setting: Community.

Participants: Three samples of working-age (21-66) adults (N=1006): (1) unable to work because of a physical condition (n=375); (2) unable to work because of a mental health condition (n=296); (3) general United States working age sample (n=335).

Intervention: NA.

Main outcome measures: All samples completed the WD-FAB 2.0; the second administration came 5 days after the first. Construct validity was examined by convergent and divergent correlational analysis using legacy measures. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1). Standard error of the mean (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) were calculated to measure scale precision and sensitivity.

Results: Physical function ICCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.77 in the general sample, and 0.66 to 0.86 in the disability sample. Mental health function scales ICCs ranged from 0.62 to 0.73 in the general sample, and 0.74 to 0.76 in the disability sample. SEMs for all scales indicated good discrimination; those for the physical function scales were generally lower than those for the mental health scales. MDC90 values ranged from 3.41 to 10.55. Correlations between all WD-FAB 2.0 scales and legacy measures were in the expected direction.

Conclusions: The study provides substantial support for the reliability and construct validity of the WD-FAB 2.0 among 3 diverse samples. Although initially developed for use within the Social Security Administration (SSA), these results suggest that the WD-FAB 2.0 could be used for assessment and measurement of work-related physical and mental health function in other contexts as well.

Keywords: Disability evaluation; Outcomes assessment; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO I, World Health Organization. International classification of functioning. Disability and Health (ICF), endorsed by all. 2007;191.
    1. Gibbons RD, Weiss DJ, Kupfer DJ, et al. Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services. 2008. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marfeo EE, Haley SM, Jette AM, et al. Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for social security work disability evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(9):1645–1652. e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ni P, McDonough CM, Jette AM, et al. Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for social security administration disability determination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(9):1661–1669. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonough CM, Jette AM, Ni P, et al. Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: Item pool construction and factor analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(9):1653–1660. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types