Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;39(4):600-615.
doi: 10.1007/s10834-018-9577-4. Epub 2018 May 16.

Born Without a Silver Spoon: Race, Wealth, and Unintended Childbearing

Affiliations

Born Without a Silver Spoon: Race, Wealth, and Unintended Childbearing

Jessica Houston Su et al. J Fam Econ Issues. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

The United States has a surprisingly high rate of unintended fertility, particularly among women of color. Although studies have examined socioeconomic correlates of unintended fertility, the role of economic resources remains unclear. Wealth may provide an important context for whether a birth was intended or unintended. Moreover, staggering racial wealth disparities may contribute to racial/ethnic patterns of unintended childbearing. This study examines the linkages between wealth and unintended first births, drawing on data from the NLSY79 (N = 1508). Results suggest that net wealth is negatively related to the probability of having an unintended first birth, controlling for a host of sociodemographic characteristics. We also use decomposition analysis to quantify wealth's contribution to racial/ethnic disparities in unintended childbearing. Second only to marital status, differences in net wealth account for 9-17% of racial/ethnic disparities in unintended childbearing. Our results suggest that wealth is a significant and heretofore overlooked correlate of unintended childbearing.

Keywords: Family planning; Fertility; Race/ethnicity; Wealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adjusted predicted probabilities of unintended first birth by net wealth decile. Predicted probabilities calculated from coefficients in fully conditional model (Table 2, Model 3)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abma JC, & Mott FL (1994). Determinants of pregnancy Wantedness: Profiling the population from an interventionist perspective. Policy Studies Review, 13(1), 39–62. 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1994.tb00578.x. - DOI
    1. Addo FR (2014). Debt, cohabitation, and marriage in young adulthood. Demography, 51(5), 1677–1701. 10.1007/s13524-014-0333-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addo FR, & Lichter DT (2013). Marriage, marital history, and Black-White wealth differentials among older women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 342–362. 10.1111/jomf.12007. - DOI
    1. Augustine JM, Nelson T, & Edin K (2009). Why do poor men have children? Fertility intentions among low-income unmarried US fathers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624, 99–117. 10.1177/0002716209334694. - DOI
    1. Axinn WG, Barber JS, & Thornton A (1998). The longterm impact of parents’ childbearing decisions on children’s self-esteem. Demography, 35(4), 435–443. 10.2307/3004012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources