The effects of experimentally induced graded monocular and binocular astigmatism on near stereoacuity
- PMID: 30581296
- PMCID: PMC6300757
- DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2018.09.001
The effects of experimentally induced graded monocular and binocular astigmatism on near stereoacuity
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effects of experimentally induced graded monocular and binocular astigmatism on near Stereoacuity in healthy adults.
Method: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 60 healthy adults ranging between 19 and 33 years of age recruited from College of Applied Medical Sciences. All subjects were emmetropic with normal binocular single vision, and stereoacuity of 40 sec of arc. Enrolled subjects were divided into four groups, each with 15 participants. Myopic astigmatism was induced in two groups, either monocularly or binocularly using +1.00 DC and +2.00 DC at different axes 45, 90 and 180. The remaining two groups were subjected to induced hypermetropic astigmatism using -1.00 DC and -2.00 DC at different axes 45, 90 and 180. The Titmus Fly Stereo Test was used to measure near stereoacuity both before and after induction of astigmatism.
Results: There was a reduction in stereoacuity with an increase in dioptric power of astigmatism (p < 0.05). In all groups, oblique astigmatism had the most significant effect followed by against the rule astigmatism and then with the rule astigmatism. Binocular induced hypermetropic astigmatism caused more reduction in stereoacuity than binocular induced myopic astigmatism, but statistically not significant. A similar impact was noted between monocular myopic astigmatism and monocular hyperopic astigmatism (p = 0.037), (p = 0.049) and (p = 0.044) with 2.00 D cylinder at 180, 90 and 45 axes, respectively.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the small amount of monocular or binocular astigmatism will affect on Stereoacuity, and the amount of reduction varies according to the axis of orientation.
Keywords: Amblyopia; Anisometropia; Astigmatism; Stereopsis; Titmus.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Threshold Values of Myopic Anisometropia Causing Loss of Stereopsis.J Ophthalmol. 2019 May 6;2019:2654170. doi: 10.1155/2019/2654170. eCollection 2019. J Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31198605 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation Between Stereoacuity and Experimentally Induced Graded Monocular and Binocular Astigmatism.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):NC14-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17341.7873. Epub 2016 May 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 27437256 Free PMC article.
-
Binocular vision of bilaterally pseudophakic eyes with induced astigmatism.Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Sep;91(9):1118-28. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000359. Optom Vis Sci. 2014. PMID: 25083837
-
The effect of monocularly and binocularly induced astigmatic blur on depth discrimination is orientation dependent.Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Feb;82(2):101-13. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000153251.39450.b4. Optom Vis Sci. 2005. PMID: 15711457
-
Predictors of stereoacuity outcome in visually mature subjects with exotropia.Eye (Lond). 2016 Feb;30(2):264-9. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.241. Epub 2015 Nov 20. Eye (Lond). 2016. PMID: 26584792 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Threshold Values of Myopic Anisometropia Causing Loss of Stereopsis.J Ophthalmol. 2019 May 6;2019:2654170. doi: 10.1155/2019/2654170. eCollection 2019. J Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31198605 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative study of stereopsis measurements: analyzing natural conditions versus dichoptic presentation using smartphones and ultraviolet printer technology.PeerJ. 2024 Feb 12;12:e16941. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16941. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 38361768 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Elliott D. 3rd ed. Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann; Edinburgh: 2007. Clinical procedures in primary eye care; p. 318p.
-
- Fielder A., Moseley M. Does stereopsis matter in humans? Eye. 1996;10(2):233–238. - PubMed
-
- Eskridge J., Amos J., Bartlett J. 1st ed. Lippincott; Philadelphia: 1991. Clinical procedures in optometry; p. 808p.
-
- Fricke T., Siderov J. Stereopsis, stereotests, and their relation to vision screening and clinical practice. Clin Exp Optom. 1997;80(5):165–172.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources