Comparative clinical trial of regional anticoagulation for hemodialysis
- PMID: 3058171
Comparative clinical trial of regional anticoagulation for hemodialysis
Abstract
The regional anticoagulating effects of FUT-175 (protease inhibitor), and regional or low dose heparinization (RH or LH) were examined comparatively by randomized controlled protocol on 157 hemodialysis (HD) patients with hemorrhagic complications. Increases in bleeding because of HD were milder in FUT as compared with RH and LH, and the bleeding time after needle removal was significantly shorter in FUT than that in heparin. During HD, the prolongation of celite activated coagulation time (CCT) of the intracorporeal blood was significantly milder in FUT than in heparin and that of blood passing through the dialyzer was increased in FUT compared with LH. FUT showed no prolongation of CCT after HD. These results indicate that FUT is a more useful and safer anticoagulant for HD patients with hemorrhagic complications than any regional anticoagulating method using heparin (RH or LH).
Similar articles
-
Nafamostat mesilate: a regional anticoagulant for hemodialysis in patients at high risk for bleeding.Nephron. 1993;64(3):376-81. doi: 10.1159/000187357. Nephron. 1993. PMID: 8341382
-
Anticoagulation with nafamostat mesilate, a synthetic protease inhibitor, in hemodialysis patients with a bleeding risk.Haemostasis. 1993 May-Jun;23(3):135-41. doi: 10.1159/000216866. Haemostasis. 1993. PMID: 8276316
-
[Effectiveness of FUT-175, protease inhibitor, as an anticoagulant to hemodialysis].Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Jun;34(6):1077-81. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988. PMID: 3223453 Japanese.
-
The bleeding risk in chronic haemodialysis: preventive strategies in high-risk patients.Neth J Med. 1996 May;48(5):198-207. doi: 10.1016/0300-2977(96)00005-8. Neth J Med. 1996. PMID: 8710039 Review.
-
Review: anticoagulation for haemodialysis.Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Jun;15(4):386-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01298.x. Nephrology (Carlton). 2010. PMID: 20609088 Review.
Cited by
-
Anticoagulation for people receiving long-term haemodialysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD011858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011858.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38189593 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesilate anticoagulation in blood purification treatment of critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):1263-1279. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2105233. Ren Fail. 2022. PMID: 35930302 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in the adsorption of nafamostat mesilate between polyester-polymer alloy and polysulfone membranes.J Artif Organs. 2017 Jun;20(2):138-144. doi: 10.1007/s10047-016-0937-2. Epub 2016 Nov 28. J Artif Organs. 2017. PMID: 27896500
-
Comparison of the cytokine adsorption ability in continuous renal replacement therapy using polyethyleneimine-coated polyacrylonitrile (AN69ST) or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) hemofilters: a pilot single-center open-label randomized control trial.Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jun 30;28(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01184-6. Eur J Med Res. 2023. PMID: 37391846 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nafamostat mesylate versus regional citrate anticoagulation for chronic hemodialysis in patients at high risk of bleeding: a single-center, retrospective study.Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2464830. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2464830. Epub 2025 Feb 20. Ren Fail. 2025. PMID: 39980305 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical