Association between socioeconomic status and incident atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 30582260
- DOI: 10.1111/imj.14214
Association between socioeconomic status and incident atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Background: Low socioeconomic status is associated with cardiovascular diseases, and an association with atrial fibrillation (AF) could guide screening.
Aim: To investigate if indices of advantage/disadvantage (IAD), index of education/occupation (IEO) and index of economic resources were associated with incident AF, independent of risk factors and cardiac function.
Methods: We studied community-based participants aged ≥65 years with AF risk factors (n = 379, age 70 ± 4 years, 45% men). The CHARGE-AF score (a well validated AF risk score) was used to assess 5-year risk of developing AF. Participants also had baseline echocardiograms. IAD, IEO and index of economic resources were obtained from the 2011 Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas score, in which higher decile ranks indicate more advantaged areas. Patients were followed up for incident AF (median 21 (range 5-31) months), with AF diagnosed by clinical review, including 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), as well as single-lead portable ECG monitoring used to record 60 s ECG tracings five times/day for 1 week. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between socioeconomic status and incident AF.
Results: Subjects with AF (n = 50, 13%) were more likely to be male (64 vs 42%, P = 0.003) and had higher CHARGE-AF score (median 7.1% (5.2-12.8%) vs 5.3% (3.3-8.6%), P < 0.001). Areas with lower socioeconomic status (IAD and IEO) had a higher risk of incident AF independent of LV function and CHARGE-AF score (hazard ratio for IAD 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.29, P = 0.005 and hazard ratio for IEO 1.18, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.30, P = 0.001).
Conclusion: Regional socioeconomic status is associated with risk of incident AF, independent of LV function and clinical risk. This association might permit better regional targeting of prevention.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; screening; socioeconomic status.
© 2018 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
References
-
- Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB, Mathewson FA, Cuddy TE. The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba follow-up study. Am J Med 1995; 98: 476-84.
-
- Vidaillet H, Granada JF, Chyou P-H, Maassen K, Ortiz M, Pulido JN et al. A population-based study of mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Am J Med 2002; 113: 365-70.
-
- Kim MH, Johnston SS, Chu B-C, Dalal MR, Schulman KL. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2011; 4: 313-20.
-
- Leyden JM, Kleinig TJ, Newbury J, Castle S, Cranefield J, Anderson CS et al. Adelaide stroke incidence study: declining stroke rates but many preventable cardioembolic strokes. Stroke 2013; 44: 1226-31.
-
- Watanabe H, Tanabe N, Watanabe T, Darbar D, Roden DM, Sasaki S et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of development of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2008; 117: 1255-60.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
