Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 21;24(1):37.
doi: 10.3390/molecules24010037.

Use of Confectionery Waste in Biogas Production by the Anaerobic Digestion Process

Agnieszka A Pilarska  1 , Krzysztof Pilarski  2 , Agnieszka Wolna-Maruwka  3 , Piotr Boniecki  4 , Maciej Zaborowicz  5
Affiliations

Use of Confectionery Waste in Biogas Production by the Anaerobic Digestion Process

Agnieszka A Pilarska et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

It was the objective of this study to verify the efficiency and stability of anaerobic digestion (AD) for selected confectionery waste, including chocolate bars (CB), wafers (W), and filled wafers (FW), by inoculation with digested cattle slurry and maize silage pulp. Information in the literature on biogas yield for these materials and on their usefulness as substrate in biogas plants remains to be scarce. Owing to its chemical structure, including the significant content of carbon-rich carbohydrates and fat, the confectionery waste has a high biomethane potential. An analysis of the AD process indicates differences in the fluctuations of the pH values of three test samples. In comparison with W and FW, CB tended to show slightly more reduced pH values in the first step of the process; moreover an increase in the content of volatile fatty acids (VFA) was recorded. In the case of FW, the biogas production process showed the highest stability. Differences in the decomposition dynamics for the three types of test waste were accounted for by their different carbohydrate contents and also different biodegradabilities of specific compounds. The highest efficiency of the AD process was obtained for the filled wafers, where the biogas volumes, including methane, were 684.79 m³ Mg-1 VS and 506.32 m³ Mg-1 VS, respectively. A comparable volume of biogas (673.48 m³ Mg-1 VS) and a lower volume of methane (407.46 m³ Mg-1 VS) were obtained for chocolate bars. The lowest volumes among the three test material types, i.e., 496.78 m³ Mg-1 VS (biogas) and 317.42 m³ Mg-1 VS (methane), were obtained for wafers. This article also proposes a method of estimation of the biochemical methane potential (theoretical BMP) based on the chemical equations of degradation of sugar, fats, and proteins and known biochemical composition (expressed in grams).

Keywords: anaerobic digestion; biodegradation; biogas and biomethane yields; confectionery waste; process stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biofermenter for biogas production tests (18-chamber section): 1—water heater with temperature adjustment; 2—water pump; 3—insulated tubes for liquid heating medium; 4—water jacket (39 °C); 5—biofermenter (1.4 dm3); 6—slurry-sample drawing tube; 7—tube for transporting the biogas; 8—graduated tank for biogas; 9—gas sampling valve.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Variation in pH and VFA/TA during anaerobic digestion process of CB, W, and FW.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative yield of: (a) biogas and (b) methane from VS of inoculum, CB, W, and FW.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative yield of: (a) biogas and (b) methane from VS of inoculum, CB, W, and FW.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mata-Alvarez J., Macé S., Llabrés P. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2000;30:3–16. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7. - DOI
    1. Kondusamy D., Kalamdhad A.S. Pre-treatment and anaerobic digestion of food waste for high rate methane production—A review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014;2:1821–1830. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2014.07.024. - DOI
    1. Dach J., Czekała W., Boniecki P., Lewicki A., Piechota T. Specialised internet tool for biogas plant modelling and marked analyzing. Adv. Mat. Res. 2014;909:305–310.
    1. Mehariya S., Patel A.K., Obulisamy P.K., Punniyakotti E., Wong J.W.C. Co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge for methane production: Current status and perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;265:519–531. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang C., Su H., Baeyens J., Tan T. Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014;38:383–392. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.038. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources