Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 24;11(Suppl 2):646.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3219-4.

A review on the progress of sex-separation techniques for sterile insect technique applications against Anopheles arabiensis

Affiliations
Review

A review on the progress of sex-separation techniques for sterile insect technique applications against Anopheles arabiensis

Thabo Mashatola et al. Parasit Vectors. .

Abstract

The feasibility of the sterile insect technique (SIT) as a malaria vector control strategy against Anopheles arabiensis has been under investigation over the past decade. One of the critical steps required for the application of this technique to mosquito control is the availability of an efficient and effective sex-separation system. Sex-separation systems eliminate female mosquitoes from the production line prior to irradiation and field release of sterile males. This is necessary because female mosquitoes can transmit pathogens such as malaria and, therefore, their release must be prevented. Sex separation also increases the efficiency of an SIT programme. Various sex-separation strategies have been explored including the exploitation of developmental and behavioural differences between male and female mosquitoes, and genetic approaches. Most of these are however species-specific and are not indicated for the major African malaria vectors such as An. arabiensis. As there is currently no reliable sex-separation method for An. arabiensis, various strategies were explored in an attempt to develop a robust system that can be applied on a mass-rearing scale. The progress and challenges faced during the development of a sexing system for future pilot and/or large-scale SIT release programmes against An. arabiensis are reviewed here. Three methods of sex separation were examined. The first is the use of pupal size for gender prediction. The second is the elimination of blood-feeding adult females through the addition of an endectocide to a blood meal source. The third is the establishment of a genetic sexing strain (GSS) carrying an insecticide resistance selectable marker (dieldrin-resistance rdl gene and/or other GABA receptor antagonists that can be used as alternative insecticides to dieldrin) or a temperature-sensitive lethal marker.

Keywords: Anopheles arabiensis; genetic sexing strain; sex-separation; sterile insect technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A schematic diagram showing how traceable phenotypic selectable markers such as Rdl could be used in conjunction with tsl, especially if they are closely linked on the same chromosome. In a GSS chromosomal translocation involving tsl and Rdl, males are hemizygous for the wild-type alleles of both loci (marked as blue) which are translocated to the Y chromosome (shown predominantly in yellow), with a reciprocal translocation to the autosome. The remaining, intact autosome carries the mutant alleles of both tsl and Rdl loci (marked as red). Females, which lack the Y chromosome, are homozygous for the mutant alleles of both tsl and Rdl, conferring the mutant phenotypes that allow for male selection, i.e. treatment with either temperature or dieldrin kills females (♀ = female, ♂ = male).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO: World Malaria. Report 2017. WHO Global Malaria Programme. World Health Organisation. 2017. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report/en/index.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2018.
    1. Sachs J, Malaney P. The economic and social burden of malaria. Nature. 2002;415:680. - PubMed
    1. Beier JC, Keating J, Githure JI, Macdonald MB, Impoinvil DE, Novak RJ. Integrated vector management for malaria control. Malar J. 2008;7:S4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chanda E, Masaninga F, Coleman M, Sikaala C, Katebe C, MacDonald M, Baboo KS, Govere J, Manga L. Integrated vector management: the Zambian experience. Malar J. 2008;7:164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fillinger U, Lindsay SW. Larval source management for malaria control in Africa: myths and reality. Malar J. 2011;10:353. - PMC - PubMed