Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 10;62(3):395-403.
doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0056. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Influence of Hydrogen-rich Saline on Hepatocyte Autophagy During Laparoscopic Liver Ischaemia-reperfusion Combined Resection Injury in Miniature Pigs

Affiliations

Influence of Hydrogen-rich Saline on Hepatocyte Autophagy During Laparoscopic Liver Ischaemia-reperfusion Combined Resection Injury in Miniature Pigs

Ge Bai et al. J Vet Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the protective effect of hydrogen-rich saline (HRS) against liver ischaemia-reperfusion combined resection injury.

Material and methods: Eighteen miniature pigs were randomly divided into three groups: a sham operated group (sham group, laparoscopic liver ischaemia-reperfusion combined resection injury group (IRI group), and a hydrogen-rich saline intervention group (IRI + HRS group). Samples of hepatic tissue and serum were collected at the time of reperfusion and then 3 h, 1 d, and 3 d post reperfusion. Liver function, oxidative stress, autophagy-related mRNA genes, and protein expression were evaluated. Changes in cell and tissue ultrastructure were examined by transmission electron microscopy.

Results: Compared with the sham group, the level of autophagy of hepatocytes increased in the IRI and IRI + HRS groups, corresponding to high oxidative stress and severe liver function injury. Liver function, antioxidant content, autophagy levels, and liver injury were improved after intervention with HRS in the IRI + HRS group compared with the IRI group.

Conclusion: Intervention with hydrogen-rich saline could exert a protective effect against liver ischaemia-reperfusion combined resection injury through the reduction of oxidative stress and hepatocyte autophagy.

Keywords: autophagy; hydrogen-rich saline; ischaemia-reperfusion combined resection; liver; miniature pigs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests Statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Levels of ALT (A), AST (B), and AKP (C) in serum. Values are mean ±standard deviation. *Significant difference from sham group. # Significant difference of IRI + HRS group from IRI group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Levels of MDA (A), CAT (B), GSH (C), and SOD (D) in liver tissue. Values are mean ±standard deviation. *Significant difference from sham group. # Significant difference of IRI + HRS group from IRI group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Liver cells. A – sham group (10,000×); B – sham group (12,000×); C – IRI group (10,000×); D – IRI group (12,000×); E – IRI + HRS group (10,000×); F – IRI + HRS group (12,000×); N – nuclei; M – mitochondria; black arrows indicate endoplasmic reticulum and white arrows indicate the Golgi apparatus
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Expression levels of Beclin1 (A), mTOR (B), p62 (C), ATG5 (D), and ATG12 (E) in the liver. Values are mean ±standard deviation. *Significant difference from sham group. # Significant difference of IRI + HRS group from IRI group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Expression levels of Beclin1 (A), LC3B (B), and p62 (C) proteins in the three groups measured by Western blot. (D) Western blot results. Values are mean ±standard deviation. * Significant difference from sham group. # Significant difference of IRI + HRS group from IRI group
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Liver. The results of IHC of LC3B at T3h; A and B – sham group; C and D – IRI group; E and F – IRI + HRS group. The images A, C, and E were recorded at 100× magnification, and the images B, D, and F were recorded at 400× magnification

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baehrecke E.H.. Autophagy: dual roles in life and death? Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:505. –. - PubMed
    1. Codogno P., Meijer A.J.. Autophagy and signaling: their role in cell survival and cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1509. –. - PubMed
    1. Cursio R., Colosetti P., Codogno P., Cuervo A M, Shen H.. The role of autophagy in liver diseases: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:480508. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farre J.C., Subramani S.. Peroxisome turnover by micropexophagy: an autophagy-related process. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:515. –. - PubMed
    1. Filomeni G., De Zio D., Cecconi F.. Oxidative stress and autophagy: the clash between damage and metabolic needs. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:377. –. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources