Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 7;3(5):e096.
doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000096. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.

Multi-modal Educational Curriculum to Improve Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale Inter-rater Reliability in Pediatric Patients

Margaret J Kihlstrom  1 , Ashley P Edge  2 , Kelly M Cherry  1 , Paul J Zarick  1 , Shawna D Beck  3 , Jenny M Boyd  1
Affiliations

Multi-modal Educational Curriculum to Improve Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale Inter-rater Reliability in Pediatric Patients

Margaret J Kihlstrom et al. Pediatr Qual Saf. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale (RASS) is a reliable and valid scale for assessing sedation in critically ill pediatric patients. This investigation evaluates the inter-rater reliability of the RASS in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients before and after an educational intervention.

Methods: This prospective, interventional quality improvement study was completed in a 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit from July 2013 to July 2014. Children 0-18 years of age requiring mechanical ventilation and receiving sedative or analgesic medications were eligible. Staff completed simultaneous paired RASS assessments in 3 phases: baseline, after educational intervention, and maintenance.

Results: Staff completed 347 paired assessments on 45 pediatric intensive care unit patients: 49 in the baseline phase, 228 in the postintervention phase, and 70 in the maintenance phase. There was a significant increase in the weighted κ after the intervention, from 0.56 (95% CI, 0.39-0.72) to 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.95; P < 0.001). The improvement was maintained months later with weighted κ 0.78 (95% CI, 0.61-0.94). In subgroup analysis, there was an increase in weighted κ in patients less than 1 year of age (0.41-0.87) and those with developmental delay (0.49-0.84).

Conclusions: The RASS is a reliable tool for sedation assessment in mechanically ventilated, sedated pediatric patients after implementation of an educational intervention. It is also reliable in patients less than 12 months of age and patients with developmental delay. The ability to easily educate providers to utilize a valid, reliable sedation tool is an important step toward using it to provide consistent care to optimize sedation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Distribution of RASS scores for 347 patient encounters.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vet NJ, Ista E, de Wildt SN, et al. Optimal sedation in pediatric intensive care patients: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1524–1534.. - PubMed
    1. Grant MJ, Balas MC, Curley MA; RESTORE Investigative Team. Defining sedation-related adverse events in the pediatric intensive care unit. Heart Lung. 2013;42:171–176.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grant MJ, Scoppettuolo LA, Wypij D, et al. ; RESTORE Investigative Team. Prospective evaluation of sedation-related adverse events in pediatric patients ventilated for acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1317–1323.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitzgerald RK, Davis AT, Hanson SJ; National Association of Children’s Hospitals and Related Institution PICU Focus Group Investigators. Multicenter analysis of the factors associated with unplanned extubation in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:e217–e223.. - PubMed
    1. Lucas da Silva PS, de Carvalho WB. Unplanned extubation in pediatric critically ill patients: a systematic review and best practice recommendations. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11:287–294.. - PubMed