Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;47(3):369-376.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003614.

What Does the Word "Treatable" Mean? Implications for Communication and Decision-Making in Critical Illness

Jason N Batten  1   2 , Katherine E Kruse  3   4 , Stephanie A Kraft  5   6 , Bela Fishbeyn  1 , David C Magnus  1
Affiliations

What Does the Word "Treatable" Mean? Implications for Communication and Decision-Making in Critical Illness

Jason N Batten et al. Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore how nonphysicians and physicians interpret the word "treatable" in the context of critical illness.

Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews.

Setting: One academic medical center.

Subjects: Twenty-four nonphysicians (patients and community members) purposively sampled for variation in demographic characteristics and 24 physicians (attending physicians and trainees) purposively sampled from four specialties (critical care, palliative care, oncology, and surgery).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We identified two distinct concepts that participants used to interpret the word "treatable": 1) a "good news" concept, in which the word "treatable" conveys a positive message about a patient's future, thereby inspiring hope and encouraging further treatment and 2) an "action-oriented" concept, in which the word "treatable" conveys that physicians have an action or intervention available, but does not necessarily imply an improved prognosis or quality of life. The overwhelming majority of nonphysicians adopted the "good news" concept, whereas physicians almost exclusively adopted the "action-oriented" concept. For some nonphysicians, the word "treatable" conveyed a positive message about prognosis and/or further treatment, even when this contradicted previously stated negative information.

Conclusions: Physician use of the word "treatable" may lead patients or surrogates to derive unwarranted good news and false encouragement to pursue treatment, even when physicians have explicitly stated information to the contrary. Further work is needed to determine the extent to which the word "treatable" and its cognates contribute to widespread decision-making and communication challenges in critical care, including discordance about prognosis, misconceptions that palliative treatments are curative, and disputes about potentially inappropriate or futile treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Number of participants using the “good news” and “action-oriented” concept of “treatable” in response to general and scenario-based questions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tulsky JA, Beach MC, Butow PN, et al.: A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177:1361–1366 - PubMed
    1. Curtis JR, Sprung CL, Azoulay E: The importance of word choice in the care of critically ill patients and their families. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40:606–608 - PubMed
    1. Quill TE, Arnold R, Back AL: Discussing treatment preferences with patients who want “everything”. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151:345–349 - PubMed
    1. Kelemen AM, Ruiz G, Groninger H: Choosing words wisely in communication with patients with heart failure and families. Am J Cardiol 2016; 117:1779–1782 - PubMed
    1. Parles K, Chabner B: “The patient failed chemotherapy” …an expunged phrase. Oncologist 2004; 9:719; author reply 719 - PubMed

Publication types