Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy
- PMID: 30585956
- DOI: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001028
Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy
Abstract
Recent advances in digital detector technology for medical radiography and fluoroscopy have resulted in improved workflow efficiency, operational flexibility, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy. This is attributed to the implementation of portable flat-panel x-ray detector devices able to provide real-time readout, processing, and display of medical images. As a result, digital radiography flat-panel detectors are rapidly replacing computed radiography passive detectors for projection imaging exams and image intensifier detectors for dynamic fluoroscopy exams. Advanced exam capabilities now include digital tomosynthesis and dual-energy radiography; the former is based on rapid acquisition of multiple angle-dependent image projections to synthesize tomographic slabs at selectable depths within the patient, and the latter is based on rapid back-to-back acquisition of the same anatomy at low and high x-ray energies to generate separate soft tissue and bone images. In both situations, superimposition of anatomy is reduced or eliminated, with the possibility of enhanced diagnostic confidence. Increased x-ray absorption efficiency and lower electronic noise of digital radiography detectors compared to computed radiography detectors enable equal image quality at lower patient dose; however, because of a disconnect between image appearance and radiation dose, lower patient dose is not always achieved. Education, training, and implementation of standards such as the International Electrotechnical Commission 62494-1 Digital Radiography Exposure Index are needed to ensure image quality at the lowest appropriate radiation dose. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements can contribute to radiation responsibility in medical imaging by providing guidance on use of digital radiography, including recommendations for acquisition protocols and exposure index standards, for development of radiographic exam diagnostic reference levels, and for oversight of retake and reject analysis.
Similar articles
-
A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):220-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch562. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005. PMID: 15933112
-
Single-Exposure, Dual-Energy Subtraction Flat Panel X-Ray Detectors: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024 Nov 12;24(9):1-76. eCollection 2024. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024. PMID: 39697784 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):984-96. doi: 10.1118/1.2174133. Med Phys. 2006. PMID: 16696475
-
Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5713-28. doi: 10.1118/1.3013604. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 19175129 Review.
-
Detectors for digital mammography.Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Aug;3(4):309-24. doi: 10.1177/153303460400300401. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004. PMID: 15270582 Review.
Cited by
-
Resolving hidden pixels beyond the resolution limit of projection imaging by square aperture.Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30516-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36859466 Free PMC article.
-
An International Non-Inferiority Study for the Benchmarking of AI for Routine Radiology Cases: Chest X-ray, Fluorography and Mammography.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;11(12):1684. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121684. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37372802 Free PMC article.
-
A Case-control Study on the Association of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption with Risk of Breast Cancer.Int J Prev Med. 2024 Oct 18;15:56. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_129_23. eCollection 2024. Int J Prev Med. 2024. PMID: 39539583 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials