Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;143(1S Management of Surgical Incisions Utilizing Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy):27S-30S.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005309.

Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obstetrics

Affiliations
Review

Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obstetrics

Glen I Feinstein. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the United States. Compared with other surgical procedures, surgical site infection tends to be a relatively uncommon outcome after cesarean delivery in the general population with an incidence rate between 1.46 and 3.82% in the United States in 2006-2008. Despite this lower incidence, surgical site infections following cesarean delivery result in a 6-day increase in mean length of stay at an additional cost of $13,968. Specifically, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been developed for use over clean, closed surgical incisions. A brief literature review on ciNPT use over cesarean delivery incisions is described.

Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. The search included publications between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2018, and focused on studies reporting the use of a specific ciNPT system (PREVENA Incision Management System; KCI, an Acelity Company, San Antonio, TX) over cesarean incisions.

Results: Five published articles were identified in the literature search that compared ciNPT use to traditional dressings. Positive clinical outcomes were reported in 2 studies, similar outcomes between ciNPT and traditional dressings were reported in 2 studies, and negative outcomes were reported in 1 study.

Conclusions: A lack of published literature reporting clinical outcomes following ciNPT use over cesarean delivery incisions exists, and the currently reported evidence is heterogeneous. As such, increased published evidence from large, randomized studies and a reexamination of ciNPT use over cesarean delivery incisions are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Kochanek KD, Kirmeyer SE, Martin JA, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2009. Pediatrics. 2012;129:338348.
    1. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:783805.
    1. de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, et al. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:387397.
    1. Tran TS, Jamulitrat S, Chongsuvivatwong V, et al. Risk factors for postcesarean surgical site infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:367371.
    1. Schneid-Kofman N, Sheiner E, Levy A, et al. Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;90:1015.