Economic Analysis Based on the Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy after Postoperative Breast Reconstruction
- PMID: 30586102
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005311
Economic Analysis Based on the Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy after Postoperative Breast Reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer accounts for 30% of all new cancer diagnoses in women. Although more options are now available regarding breast reconstruction, the risk of complications (eg, infection, dehiscence, and expander exposure) is also prevalent and must be considered when choosing a reconstruction option because the cost for complications can be substantial.
Methods: A hypothetical cost model was applied to clinical outcomes of a previous retrospective study comparing the use of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) and standard of care (SOC) over breast incisions after immediate reconstruction. The adjusted complication cost for a mastectomy with reconstruction was a mean of $10,402 and was calculated using a database of inpatient, outpatient, and carrier claims.
Results: The previous retrospective study included data on 665 breasts (ciNPT = 331, SOC = 334) and 356 female patients (ciNPT = 177, SOC = 179) and reported on complication rates at the breast level: 8.5% (28/331) for the ciNPT breast group versus 15.9% (53/334) for the SOC group (P = 0.0092). In the ciNPT group, 24/177 patients (13.6%) had a complication, whereas in the SOC group, 38/179 patients (21.2%) had a complication. Based on the adjusted mean complication cost of $10,402, total complication cost for the ciNPT group was $250,000 versus $395,000 for the SOC group with a per-patient cost savings of $218.00 with ciNPT.
Conclusion: The authors' preliminary findings show potential cost savings with the use of ciNPT over breast incisions and warrant further study regarding the cost-effectiveness of ciNPT compared with standard of care after immediate breast reconstruction.
Similar articles
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy for Surgical Site Management After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S790-S795. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.022. Epub 2022 Mar 12. J Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35288248 Clinical Trial.
-
The Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy on Postoperative Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Aug 7;6(8):e1880. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001880. eCollection 2018 Aug. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018. PMID: 30324063 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing donor-site complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction with closed incisional negative pressure therapy: A cost-benefit analysis.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Mar;78:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 5. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023. PMID: 36739647
-
Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Efficacy in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in High-Risk Patients: A Meta-analysis.J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.033. Epub 2019 Apr 19. J Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31009887
-
A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Use of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure System in Vascular Surgery Groin Incisions.Am Surg. 2023 Jun;89(6):2237-2246. doi: 10.1177/00031348221087395. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Am Surg. 2023. PMID: 35392664 Review.
Cited by
-
Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes of Two Different Closed Incision Negative Pressure Systems in Breast Surgery and Implications to Cost of Care.Eplasty. 2024 Jul 17;24:e40. eCollection 2024. Eplasty. 2024. PMID: 39224414 Free PMC article.
-
Closed-Incision and Surrounding Soft Tissue Negative Pressure Dressings in Post-Mastectomy Pre-Pectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.Plast Surg (Oakv). 2022 Nov;30(4):325-332. doi: 10.1177/22925503211019628. Epub 2021 May 28. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2022. PMID: 36212096 Free PMC article.
-
Simple and Efficient Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction via Primary Closure Combined with Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CiNPWT)-Experience of a Single Surgeon.J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 29;12(2):182. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020182. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35207670 Free PMC article.
-
PICO™ (Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy) Dressing Use as Postoperative Prophylaxis for Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69214. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39398780 Free PMC article.
-
Closed incision negative pressure therapy following abdominoplasty after breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):326-331. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13273. Epub 2019 Nov 27. Int Wound J. 2020. PMID: 31777164 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:730.
-
- Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, et al. Complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a claims-based analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263:219227.
-
- Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:22652274.
-
- Phillips BT, Bishawi M, Dagum AB, et al. A systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:113.
-
- Sullivan SR, Fletcher DR, Isom CD, et al. True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1928.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical