Choosing an appropriate probiotic product for your patient: An evidence-based practical guide
- PMID: 30586435
- PMCID: PMC6306248
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209205
Choosing an appropriate probiotic product for your patient: An evidence-based practical guide
Abstract
Introduction: Clinicians and patients face a daunting task when choosing the most appropriate probiotic for their specific needs. Available preparations encompass a diverse and continuously expanding product base, with most available products lacking evidence-based trials that support their use. Even when evidence exists, not all probiotic products are equally effective for all disease prevention or treatment indications. At this point in time, drug regulatory agencies offer limited assistance with regard to guidance and oversight in most countries, including the U.S.
Methods: We reviewed the current medical literature and sources on the internet to survey the types of available probiotic products and to determine which probiotics had evidence-based efficacy data. Standard medical databases from inception to June 2018 were searched and discussions with experts in the field were conducted. We graded the strength of the evidence for probiotics having multiple, randomized controlled trials and developed a guide for the practical selection of current probiotic products for specific uses.
Results: We found the efficacy of probiotic products is both strain-specific and disease-specific. Important factors involved in choosing the appropriate probiotic include matching the strain(s) with the targeted disease or condition, type of formulation, dose used and the source (manufacturing quality control and shelf-life). While we found many probiotic products lacked confirmatory trials, we found sufficient evidence for 22 different types of probiotics from 249 trials to be included. For example, several types of probiotics had strong evidence for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea [Saccharomyces boulardii I-745, a three-strain mixture (Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, L. casei Lbc80r, L. rhamnosus CLR2) and L. casei DN114001]. Strong evidence was also found for four types of probiotics for the prevention of a variety of other diseases/conditions (enteral-feed associated diarrhea, travellers' diarrhea, necrotizing enterocolits and side-effects associated with H. pylori treatments. The evidence was most robust for the treatment of pediatric acute diarrhea based on 59 trials (7 types of probiotics have strong efficacy), while an eight-strain multi-strain mixture showed strong efficacy for inflammatory bowel disease and two types of probiotics had strong efficacy for irritable bowel disease. Of the 22 types of probiotics reviewed, 15 (68%) had strong-moderate evidence for efficacy for at least one type of disease.
Conclusion: The choice of an appropriate probiotic is multi-factored, based on the mode and type of disease indication and the specific efficacy of probiotic strain(s), as well as product quality and formulation.
Trial registration: This review was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42018103979.
Conflict of interest statement
This study was funded by an unrestricted educational grant from Bio-K+ to cover publication fees. Bio-K Plus International, Inc. owns and manufactures the product Bio-K+ [“Lactic bacteria and their use in the prevention of diarrhea” US Patent no: 15/597,613]." JS and CT are on the Advisory Board of Bio-K+ (Canada). LVM is on the Advisory Board of Bio-K+ (Canada) and on the Biocodex Microbiome Advisory Board (France) and is a paid lecturer for Bio-K+, Biocodex and Lallemand. EJCG is on the following Advisory boards: Merck & Co, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, BioK+, Cutis Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Adventis, Summit Corp. plc, Kindred Healthcare Corp., Sankyo-Daichi, Paratek Pharma, Shionogi Inc.; and on the Speakers’ bureau for: Bayer Inc., Merck & Co, Medicines Co. Allergan Inc.; and also research grants with: Bayer Inc., Cutis Pharmaceuticals, Entasis Therapeutics,Merck & Co, Micromyx LLC, Parateck Pharmaceuticals, Spero Therapeutics, and Tetraphase Therapeutics. None of the authors own stock or equity in any of these companies. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Strain-Specificity and Disease-Specificity of Probiotic Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 May 7;5:124. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00124. eCollection 2018. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018. PMID: 29868585 Free PMC article.
-
The Acid-Dependent and Independent Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lacticaseibacillus casei LBC80R, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CLR2 on Clostridioides difficile R20291.Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021 Aug;13(4):949-956. doi: 10.1007/s12602-020-09729-5. Epub 2021 Jan 25. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021. PMID: 33492661
-
Primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infections with a specific probiotic combining Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, and L. rhamnosus strains: assessing the evidence.J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):443-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 24. J Hosp Infect. 2018. PMID: 29702133 Review.
-
Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity.Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Mar;66(3):694-704. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06244-z. Epub 2020 Apr 9. Dig Dis Sci. 2021. PMID: 32274669
-
Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CLR2 (Bio-K+): Characterization, Manufacture, Mechanisms of Action, and Quality Control of a Specific Probiotic Combination for Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60 Suppl 2:S135-43. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ179. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25922399 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy of Probiotics in Improving Motor Function and Alleviating Constipation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Iran J Pharm Res. 2023 Sep 1;22(1):e137840. doi: 10.5812/ijpr-137840. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Iran J Pharm Res. 2023. PMID: 38116573 Free PMC article.
-
Empiric Antibiotics in COVID 19: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2022 Jun 2;14(6):e25596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25596. eCollection 2022 Jun. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35795519 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The double-edged sword of probiotic supplementation on gut microbiota structure in Helicobacter pylori management.Gut Microbes. 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2108655. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2108655. Gut Microbes. 2022. PMID: 35951774 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Probiotics for the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 2;10(8):1450. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081450. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36011108 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gut Microbiome in Retina Health: The Crucial Role of the Gut-Retina Axis.Front Microbiol. 2022 Jan 14;12:726792. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.726792. eCollection 2021. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35095780 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Schultz M, Baranchi A, Thurston L, Yu YC, Wang L, Chen J, et al. Consumer demographics and expectations of probiotic therapy in New Zealand: results of a large telephone survey. N Z Med J. 2011; 124: 36–43. - PubMed
-
- Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012. National health statistics reports; no 79. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2015. Available at: https://nccih.nih.gov/research/statistics/NHIS/2012/natural-products/bio.... Accessed June 1, 2017. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Grand View Research. Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods. Global Industry Report. September 2016. Available at: http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/probiotics-market. Accessed June 1, 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical