Utility of leucocyte antigens in distinguishing between bacterial and viral infection in children
- PMID: 30588170
- PMCID: PMC6305613
- DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2018.80044
Utility of leucocyte antigens in distinguishing between bacterial and viral infection in children
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate diagnosis of bacterial and viral infection is very difficult. Unfortunately, there is still no quick and discriminative diagnostic test that would help clinicians in establishing the diagnosis and taking a decision on treatment. The aim of the study was to compare the expression of antigens on phagocytes, which are involved in the first defence line during bacterial and viral infections in children, as a potential tool to distinguish the etiology of the infection.
Material and methods: The expression of CD35, CD32, CD88, and MHC class I on phagocytes in 49 blood samples from children with high fever and suspected infection as well as 19 healthy children (control group) was assessed by flow cytometry. Thirty-three children were diagnosed with bacterial and 16 with viral infection. Expression of antigens was analysed on a FACSCanto II flow cytometer according to mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and antibody binding cites (ABC).
Results: Significant differences were observed for the following: CD32, CD35, CD88, and MHCI on granulocytes; CD32, CD35, CD88 on monocytes; and MHC-I ratio between groups were observed. The obtained results did not allow us to establish valuable score points for distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections. Classification and a regression tree using CD88 expression on granulocytes and CRP was developed. It enabled us to differentiate between the origin of infection with sensitivity and specificity of more than 90%.
Conclusions: Utility of use of wide range antigens' expression on phagocytes for distinguishing between bacterial and viral infection in children has limited value. More adequate seems to be use of CD88 expression on granulocytes linked with CRP value.
Keywords: CD35; CD88; children; flow cytometry; infection.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Honda T, Uehara T, Matsumoto G, et al. Neutrophil left shift and white blood cell count as markers of bacterial infection. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;457:46–53. - PubMed
-
- Dubos F, Moulin F, Gajdos V, et al. Serum procalcitonin and other biologic markers to distinguish between bacterial and aseptic meningitis. J Pediatr. 2006;149:72–76. - PubMed
-
- Chauhan N, Tiwari S, Jain U. Potential biomarkers for effective screening of neonatal sepsis infections: An overview. Microb Pathog. 2017;107:234–242. - PubMed
-
- Dymicka-Piekarska V, Wasiluk A. Procalcitonin (PCT), contemporary indicator of infection and inflammation. Postepy Hig Med Dos. 2015;69:723–728. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous