Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;94(3):1089-1104.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12493. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations

Affiliations

Assessing the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions in natural populations

Geoffrey E Hill et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Metazoans exist only with a continuous and rich supply of chemical energy from oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria. The oxidative phosphorylation machinery that mediates energy conservation is encoded by both mitochondrial and nuclear genes, and hence the products of these two genomes must interact closely to achieve coordinated function of core respiratory processes. It follows that selection for efficient respiration will lead to selection for compatible combinations of mitochondrial and nuclear genotypes, and this should facilitate coadaptation between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes (mitonuclear coadaptation). Herein, we outline the modes by which mitochondrial and nuclear genomes may coevolve within natural populations, and we discuss the implications of mitonuclear coadaptation for diverse fields of study in the biological sciences. We identify five themes in the study of mitonuclear interactions that provide a roadmap for both ecological and biomedical studies seeking to measure the contribution of intergenomic coadaptation to the evolution of natural populations. We also explore the wider implications of the fitness consequences of mitonuclear interactions, focusing on central debates within the fields of ecology and biomedicine.

Keywords: coadaptation; coevolution; epistatic interactions; fitness; gene flow; mitochondria; mitochondrial medicine; speciation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Predicted organismal fitness, organelle function, and potential for maladapted mitonuclear genotypes during mitochondrial replacement theory. Three possible mitochondrial donors are shown, yielding variable degrees of conceivable mitonuclear incompatibilities. Importantly, deleterious mtDNA mutations (shown in red) have known fitness consequences, while those resulting from mitonuclear incompatibilities are predicted and likely complex.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of mitonuclear interactions: A) Multisubunit protein complexes of the electron transport chain, B) mitochondrial rRNA and nuclear ribosomal proteins of the mitochondrial ribosome, C) mitochondrial tRNA-Thr and nuclear threonyl-tRNA synthetase, and D) mitochondrial DNA and nuclear DNA polymerase gamma. Non-interacting mitochondrial-encoded components are presented in green, nuclear-encoded components are in yellow, and interacting residues that physically contact residues encoded by the other genome are in red. All models are from mammals, except C) which is from yeast. Interacting residues were identified following Sharbrough et al. 2017. PDB accessions used in structural depictions: 5LNK, 1ZOY, 1BGY, 1V54, 5ARA, 3J9M, 4YYE, and 5C51.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Predicted organismal fitness and organelle function across generations. Note that in the F1 generation, mitonuclear incompatibilities will generally be masked by retention of a maternal allele. Most mitonuclear incompatibilities are predicted to occur in F2 or later generations. After Burton et al. 2013.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aledo JC, Valverde H, Ruíz-Camacho M, Morilla I, and López FD (2014). Protein-protein interfaces from cytochrome c oxidase i evolve faster than nonbinding surfaces, yet negative selection is the driving force. Genome Biology and Evolution 6:3064–3076. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu240 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen JF (2017). The CoRR hypothesis for genes in organelles. Journal of Theoretical Biology 0:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.04.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alston CL, Rocha MC, Lax NZ, Turnbull DM, and Taylor RW (2017). The genetics and pathology of mitochondrial disease. Journal of Pathology 241:236–250. doi: 10.1002/path.4809 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnqvist G, Dowling DK, Eady P, Gay L, Tregenza T, Tuda M, and Hosken DJ (2010). Genetic architecture of metabolic rate: Environment specific epistasis between mitochondrial and nuclear genes in an insect. Evolution 64:3354–3363. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01135.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avise JC (2004). Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution In Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.04.002 - DOI

Publication types