Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan;143(1):159-167.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005088.

Variation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in the United States: 2010 to 2015

Helen E Huetteman  1 , Melissa J Shauver  1 , Sunitha Malay  1 , Ting-Ting Chung  1 , Kevin C Chung  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Variation in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in the United States: 2010 to 2015

Helen E Huetteman et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: It remains unknown whether treatment trends for distal radius fracture have changed in light of value-based care initiatives during recent years. The authors aimed to characterize modern practice patterns for distal radius fracture management.

Methods: Truven MarketScan databases from 2009 to 2015 were used to extract demographic characteristics, geographic location, and comorbidities for patients receiving treatment for a distal radius fracture. Regression modeling and Joinpoint analysis were used to assess treatment trends and the association of patient factors with treatment provided.

Results: Among 499,766 eligible encounters, the rate of internal fixation fluctuated around 13 percent. Casting/splinting remained the most frequent treatment across all populations. Treatment trends varied by age; children and adolescents almost exclusively received closed treatment (mean, 97 percent), yet rates of internal fixation increased among adults and elderly patients. Patients aged 55 to 64 years were most likely to undergo internal fixation (OR, 1.89; 95 percent CI, 1.82 to 1.96). Higher median household income also significantly increased odds of receiving internal fixation (p < 0.001). Despite declining rates of external fixation and percutaneous pinning, regional variations among surgical modalities persist.

Conclusions: The increased use of internal fixation for distal radius fractures may be slowing. Treatment type continues to differ widely across demographic groups, underscoring the need for standardization. In accordance with value-based care initiatives, treatment decisions should be made to combine patient needs with financial implications on the health system. Comparative effectiveness data to derive optimal management strategies are still warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flowchart of Cohort Development *Specified procedures include closed treatment, external fixation, percutaneous fixation, or open treatment. DRF, distal radius fracture
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Rate of Internal Fixation According to Year by Age Group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Karl JW, Olson PR, Rosenwasser MP. The Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(8):e242–244. - PubMed
    1. Melton LJ 3rd, Amadio PC, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM. Long-term trends in the incidence of distal forearm fractures. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 1998;8(4):341–348. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The treatment of distal radius fractures. Rosemont, IL2009.
    1. Chen Y, Chen X, Li Z, Yan H, Zhou F, Gao W. Safety and Efficacy of Operative Versus Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The Journal of hand surgery. 2016;41(3):404–413. - PubMed
    1. Ju JH, Jin GZ, Li GX, Hu HY, Hou RX. Comparison of treatment outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical treatment of distal radius fracture in elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery. 2015;400(7):767–779. - PubMed

Publication types