Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 30591153
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.09.005
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement vs composite for orthodontic bonding: A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare the incidence of new demineralized lesions and bond failures between 2 groups of participants wearing fixed orthodontic appliances bonded with either light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement or light-cured composite.
Methods: This trial was a multicenter (6 centers: 2 teaching hospitals, 4 specialist orthodontic practices), single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel groups. Patients aged 11 years or older, in the permanent dentition, and about to start fixed orthodontic treatment in these 6 centers were randomly allocated to have either resin-modified glass ionomer cement or light-cured composite for bonding brackets, forward of the first molars. Pretreatment and day-of-debond digital photographic images were taken of the teeth and assessed by up to 5 clinical and 3 lay assessors for the presence or absence of new demineralized lesions and the esthetic impact. The assessors were masked as to group allocation.
Results: We randomized 210 participants, and 197 completed the trial. There were 173 with complete before-and after-digital images of the teeth. The incidence of new demineralized lesions was 24%; but when the esthetic impact was taken into account, this was considerably lower (9%). There was no statistically significant difference between the bracket adhesives in the numbers with at least 1 new demineralized lesion (risk ratio,1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.13; P = 0.403) or first-time bracket failure (risk ratio,0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.16; P = 0.35). There were no adverse effects.
Conclusions: There is no evidence that the use of resin modified glass ionomer cement over light-cured composite for bonding brackets reduces the incidence of new demineralized lesions or bond failures. There might be other reasons for using resin modified glass ionomer cement.
Registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.govNCT01925924.
Protocol: The protocol is available from the corresponding author on request.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
There seem to be no differences in demineralized lesions or bracket bonding failure between a fluoride-releasing glass ionomer cement and composite in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Jul;150(7):e106. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.02.028. Epub 2019 Apr 9. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019. PMID: 30979399 No abstract available.
-
Importance of photographic standardization.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jun;155(6):756-757. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.014. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31153490 No abstract available.
-
Authors' response.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jun;155(6):757. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.03.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31153491 No abstract available.
-
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement versus composite for orthodontic bonding: The need for standardization.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jul;156(1):5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.014. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31256837 No abstract available.
-
Authors' response.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jul;156(1):6-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.015. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019. PMID: 31256839 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical