Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 27;19(1):82.
doi: 10.3390/s19010082.

Pulse Radar with Field-Programmable Gate Array Range Compression for Real Time Displacement and Vibration Monitoring

Affiliations

Pulse Radar with Field-Programmable Gate Array Range Compression for Real Time Displacement and Vibration Monitoring

Mihai-Liviu Tudose et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

This paper aims to present the basic functionality of a radar platform for real time monitoring of displacement and vibration. The real time capabilities make the radar platform useful when live monitoring of targets is required. The system is based on the RF analog front-end of a USRP, and the range compression (time-domain cross-correlation) is implemented on the FPGA included in the USRP. Further processing is performed on the host computer to plot real time range profiles, displacements, vibration frequencies spectra and spectrograms (waterfall plots) for long term monitoring. The system is currently in experimental form and the present paper aims to prove its functionality. The precision of this system is estimated (using the 3σ approximation) at 0.6 mm for displacement measurements and 1.8 mm for vibration amplitude measurements.

Keywords: FPGA; USRP; cross-correlation; displacement; pulse radar; real time; vibration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Displacement measurement geometry. Target is placed at a fixed range R0. The target’s displacement or vibration is described by ΔR(t). ΔR(t) is much smaller than R0.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic block of the entire radar system, containing “USRP-2954R”.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pulse radar FPGA implementation overview. Two different clock domains exist: system clock and sampling clock. The system clock was chosen based on the implementation timing constraints. The two domains are linked by the “Start trigger 2” signal and by the RX memory contents.
Figure 4
Figure 4
I samples of RX1 and RX2 signals, with their corresponding time domain duration, as received by the platform when a close target is placed in front of the radar.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cross-correlation block diagram, as well as the related blocks that operate in the system clock domain. The contents of the RX1 memory are dumped in the corresponding buffer. Then, the contents of the second memory are dumped in “Buffer 2”. The two buffers are actually shift registers composed of cascaded FFs (flip-flops). The multiplications and partial results summation are performed each clock period. The magnitude and phase of the obtained range profile are sent to the host computer using FIFOs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Timing diagram of the operations performed during a PRI. The sampling clock period is denoted Tsamp_clk and the system clock period is denoted Tsys_clk. The system clock period is four times greater than the sampling clock period. The time available for data transfer from FPGA to host and additional host processing is the time left after the end of cross-correlation computation until the next PRI.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Resulted signals from FPGA range compression, based on the RX1 and RX2 signals plotted in Figure 4, as displayed on the host interface. The peak in the first plot indicates the delay between the two signals.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Displacement measurement errors at 7.5 m and at 30 m range. Note the slightly larger error for the 30 m range.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Displacement measurement errors at 30 m range for 30 consecutive steps in the same direction, with a step size of 5 mm.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Standard deviation of the displacement measurement versus signal-to-noise ratio, in the simulated, theoretical and experimental cases.
Figure 11
Figure 11
(a) Vibrating target mechanical fixture drawing. An audio speaker is used as the vibrating element, with a metallic plate mounted on the dust cap. A linear potentiometer is used to sense the vibration amplitude. (b) Photography of the assembled mechanical fixture mounted on a tripod.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Vibration monitoring on the vibrating target, set at a 12 Hz frequency. Data from 256 radar pulses was used for the computation of this spectrum. The fundamental component at 12 Hz is the most powerful, followed by weak harmonics at 24 Hz and 36 Hz.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Indoor vibration amplitude measurement results, for a frequency range from 5 Hz to 50 Hz (half the PRF of the radar, in order to prevent aliasing). The indoor target was placed at a range of 3 m.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Outdoor vibration amplitude measurement results, for a frequency range from 5 Hz to 50 Hz. The radar to target range was approximately 10 m.

References

    1. Kirubarajan T., Bar-Shalom Y. Low observable target motion analysis using amplitude information. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1996;32:1367–1384. doi: 10.1109/7.543858. - DOI
    1. Ciuonzo D., Willett P.K., Bar-Shalom Y. Tracking the tracker from its passive sonar ML-PDA estimates. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2014;50:573–590. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2013.120407. - DOI
    1. Vinci G., Lindner S., Barbon F., Mann S., Hofmann M., Duda A., Weigel R., Koelpin A. Six-Port Radar Sensor for Remote Respiration Rate and Heartbeat Vital-Sign Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 2013;61:2093–2100. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2013.2247055. - DOI
    1. Bugaev A.S., Vasil’ev I.A., Ivashov S.I., Chapurskii V.V. Radar Methods of Detection of Human Breathing and Heartbeat. J. Commun. Technol. Electronic. 2006;51:1154–1168. doi: 10.1134/S1064226906100056. - DOI
    1. Gentile C. Vibration measurement by radar techniques; Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN; Leuven, Belgium. 4–6 July 2011.

LinkOut - more resources