Chondrosarcoma transformation in hereditary multiple exostoses: A systematic review and clinical and cost-effectiveness of a proposed screening model
- PMID: 30591865
- PMCID: PMC6303411
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.09.011
Chondrosarcoma transformation in hereditary multiple exostoses: A systematic review and clinical and cost-effectiveness of a proposed screening model
Abstract
Background: The most serious complication of hereditary multiple exostoses(HME) is chondrosarcoma transformation. Numerous authors have suggested that screening might allow early chondrosarcoma detection. However, literature-quoted incidences of malignant transformation are highly variable.
Methods: A systematic review of malignant transformation by sex, exostosin-1 mutation(EXT1), age and site was conducted searching Medline, Embase and CINHAL. Three HME screening strategies were then developed and compared using cost per life-year gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Results: Systematic review: 18 papers with 852 chondrosarcomas were identified. The incidence of chondrosarcoma transformation averaged 4%, 75.2% occurring between ages 20-40 and 56.2% at the pelvis and proximal femur. Screening model: In the general HME population, plain radiographs provided cost per life-year gain of £19,013 compared to £53,392 in MRIs. ICER in MRIs compared to X-rays was £80,218. However, for every generation of HME patients screened over 20 years, X-ray radiation induced 0.65 cancers. Psychological effects of false-positives were marginal. Screening only higher-risk groups (males or EXT1) reduced cost but benefited fewer patients.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that annual MRI screening for all HME patients between age 20-40 may be of value. However, the extent of anatomical imaging is subject to debate; it is possible that focused imaging protocols which scan from cervical spine to proximal femur may improve cost-effectiveness.
Keywords: Chondrosarcoma; Hereditary multiple exostosis; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; MRI; Mass screening; X-ray.
Figures
References
-
- Schmale G.A., Conrad E.U., 3rd, Raskind W.H. The natural history of hereditary multiple exostoses. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76(7):986–992. - PubMed
-
- Ahn J., Ludecke H.J., Lindow S., Horton W.A., Lee B., Wagner M.J., Horsthemke B., Wells D.E. Cloning of the putative tumour suppressor gene for hereditary multiple exostoses (EXT1) Nature Gen. 1995;11(2):137–143. - PubMed
-
- Stickens D., Clines G., Burbee D., Ramos P., Thomas S., Hogue D., Hecht J.T., Lovett M., Evans G.A. The EXT2 multiple exostoses gene defines a family of putative tumour suppressor genes. Nature Gen. 1996;14(1):25–32. - PubMed
-
- Legeai-Mallet L., Munnich A., Maroteaux P., Le Merrer M. Incomplete penetrance and expressivity skewing in hereditary multiple exostoses. Clin. Genet. 1997;52(1):12–16. - PubMed
-
- Altay M., Bayrakci K., Yildiz Y., Erekul S., Saglik Y. Secondary chondrosarcoma in cartilage bone tumors: report of 32 patients. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(5):415–423. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
