Risk disclosure after Montgomery: Where are we going?
- PMID: 30591912
- PMCID: PMC6305884
- DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2018.e00090
Risk disclosure after Montgomery: Where are we going?
Abstract
•The new standard of disclosure following Montgomery v Lanarkshire is arguably more patient-centred but has introduced uncertainty•In an increasingly litigious culture, we expect that the standard of disclosure will become even higher, contrary to the interests of patients.
Keywords: Consent; Disclosure; Ethics; Medical law; Negligence.
References
-
- Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and others [1985] (871 AC).
-
- Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] (1 WLR 582).
-
- General Medical Council . 1998. Seeking Patients' Consent: The Ethical Considerations.
-
- General Medical Council . Vol. 16. 2008. Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions Together.
-
- Pearce & Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust: CA 20 [1998] (EWCA Civ 865, [1999] PIQR P53).
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources