Women-centered care: Implementation of CenteringPregnancy® in The Netherlands
- PMID: 30592082
- DOI: 10.1111/birt.12413
Women-centered care: Implementation of CenteringPregnancy® in The Netherlands
Abstract
Introduction: In response to a relatively high perinatal mortality rate in The Netherlands, the Dutch Health Ministry recommended changes to maternity care, opening a pathway toward more integrated woman-centered services. Because of its potential to positively influence risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes, CenteringPregnancy (CP) group prenatal care was implemented.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study (n = 2318) and survey on women's experiences (n = 222) in eight primary care midwifery practices to investigate outcome differences between CP and traditional individual prenatal care. Data from the period 2011-2013 were analyzed.
Results: Primiparous and multiparous CP women attended more prenatal care visits compared with women who received individual care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.23 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.29] and 1.29 [1.21-1.36]). Fewer primiparous CP women used pain relief during labor (0.56 [0.43-0.73]), and they initiated breastfeeding more often (1.74 [1.15-2.62]). Women participating in CP were more likely to feel that their wishes with respect to medication use (69.1% vs 54.4%, P = 0.039), physical activities (72.8% vs 52.5%, P = 0.008), and relaxation exercises (67.9% vs 35.6%, P ≤ 0.001) were listened to by care providers. They also felt more supported to actively participate in their care (89.6% vs 68.5%, P = 0.001) and felt more able to voice opinions about care (92.7% vs 73.9%, P = 0.002).
Conclusions: The CP model is a good approach aligning with Dutch policy calling for women-centered care and responding to the needs of pregnant women. This study supports CP scale-up in The Netherlands and adds to the pool of international knowledge about CP implementation.
Keywords: CenteringPregnancy; group prenatal care; pregnancy outcomes; vulnerable women; women-centered care.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Mohangoo AD, Buitendijk SE, Hukkelhoven CW, et al. Higher perinatal mortality in The Netherlands than in other European countries: the Peristat-II study. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008;152(50):2718-2727.
-
- VWS. 'Ketenzorg zwangerschap en geboorte' (parliament report health care chain pregnancy and childbirth). 2008; Kamerstuk 29 323/22, nr 49.
-
- Stuurgroep zwangerschap en geboorte. Een goed begin (A good start). 2009. Report. Available from www.kennisnetgeboortezorg.nl. Accessed December 17, 2018.
-
- College Perinatale Zorg. Zorgstandaard Integrale Geboortezorg (ZIG). Version 1.1, 2016. Guideline. Available from www.kennisnetgeboortezorg.nl. Accessed December 17, 2018.
-
- de Jonge A, Baron R, Westerneng M, Twisk J, Hutton EK. Perinatal mortality rate in the Netherlands compared to other European countries: a secondary analysis of euro-PERISTAT data. Midwifery. 2013;29(8):1011-1018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
