Ethical issues in human germline gene editing: a perspective from China
- PMID: 30593648
- DOI: 10.1007/s40592-018-0091-0
Ethical issues in human germline gene editing: a perspective from China
Abstract
The ethical issues associated with germline gene modification and embryo research are some of the most contentious in current international science policy debates. In this paper, we argue that new genetic techniques, such as CRISPR, demonstrate that there is an urgent need for China to develop its own regulatory and ethical framework governing new developments in genetic and embryo research. While China has in place a regulatory framework, it needs to be strengthened to include better compliance oversight and explicit criteria for how different types of research should be reviewed by regulatory authorities. We also document a variety of opinions about the new technologies among the public, scholars, and policy makers. China needs to develop its own regulations in coordination with other countries; but it is unlikely that an international consensus will be achieved in this area, given the existing differences in regulations between countries. We should aim at harmonization, not necessarily complete consensus, and the perspective from China is vital when international norms are developed and harmonized. Chinese policy makers and researchers need to be aware of the international discussions, at the same time as the international community is aware of, and accommodates, Chinese positions on important policy options.
Keywords: 14-Day rule; China; Gene editing; Germline; Human embryo.
Similar articles
-
Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2019 Jan.;20(1):32-38. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1800624. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2019. PMID: 30614228 Free PMC article.
-
Regulating germline editing in assisted reproductive technology: An EU cross-disciplinary perspective.Bioethics. 2020 Jan;34(1):16-32. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12705. Bioethics. 2020. PMID: 31877579
-
The Wisdom of Germline Editing: An Ethical Analysis of the Use of CRISPR-Cas9 to Edit Human Embryos.New Bioeth. 2019 Jun;25(2):137-152. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2019.1606151. New Bioeth. 2019. PMID: 31130112
-
The ethics of creating genetically modified children using genome editing.Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017 Dec;24(6):418-423. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000369. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017. PMID: 28885275 Review.
-
The clinical application of gene editing: ethical and social issues.Per Med. 2019 Jul;16(4):337-350. doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0155. Epub 2019 Jul 23. Per Med. 2019. PMID: 31331245 Review.
Cited by
-
Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act: Pragmatic Reforms in Support of Research.Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 10;6:157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00157. eCollection 2019. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019. PMID: 31355201 Free PMC article.
-
"CRISPR babies": What does this mean for science and Canada?CMAJ. 2019 Jan 28;191(4):E91-E92. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181657. CMAJ. 2019. PMID: 30692104 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Attitude Disparity and Worrying Scenarios in Genetic Discrimination-Based on Questionnaires from China.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;11(2):188. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020188. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36673556 Free PMC article.
-
Gene therapy to enhance angiogenesis in chronic wounds.Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2022 Aug 17;29:871-899. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.08.020. eCollection 2022 Sep 13. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2022. PMID: 36159590 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Site-specific genome editing in treatment of inherited diseases: possibility, progress, and perspectives.Med Rev (2021). 2022 Nov 11;2(5):471-500. doi: 10.1515/mr-2022-0029. eCollection 2022 Oct. Med Rev (2021). 2022. PMID: 37724161 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical